Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36350674›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

Deep learning-assisted genome-wide characterization of massively parallel reporter assays.

Fred Lu, Aaron Sossin, Nathan Abell, Stephen B Montgomery, Zihuai He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome evolution through polyploidy: Enhancing plant stress resilience in agriculture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fred LuDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Aaron SossinDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nathan AbellDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stephen B MontgomeryDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Zihuai HeDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8220-4183

Funding

Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterAdmin Supp: Developing iPSC models for AD and PDP30AG066515 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ELIZABETH MORMINO · 2020 to 2026
$29.0M
Statistical and computational methods for integrative analysis of Alzheimer's Disease geneticsR01AG066206 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HE, ZIHUAI · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066515NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA) is a high-throughput method that enables the study of the regulatory activities of tens of thousands of DNA oligonucleotides in a single experiment. While MPRA experiments have grown in popularity, their small sample sizes compared to the scale of the human genome limits our understanding of the regulatory effects they detect. To address this, we develop a deep learning model, MpraNet, to distinguish potential MPRA targets from the background genome. This model achieves high discriminative performance (AUROC = 0.85) at differentiating MPRA positives from a set of control variants that mimic the background genome when applied to the lymphoblastoid cell line. We observe that existing functional scores represent very distinct functional effects, and most of them fail to characterize the regulatory effect that MPRA detects. Using MpraNet, we predict potential MPRA functional variants across the genome and identify the distributions of MPRA effect relative to other characteristics of genetic variation, including allele frequency, alternative functional annotations specified by FAVOR, and phenome-wide associations. We also observed that the predicted MPRA positives are not uniformly distributed across the genome; instead, they are clumped together in active regions comprising 9.95% of the genome and inactive regions comprising 89.07% of the genome. Furthermore, we propose our model as a screen to filter MPRA experiment candidates at genome-wide scale, enabling future experiments to be more cost-efficient by increasing precision relative to that observed from previous MPRAs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNAGenome, HumanHumansSequence Analysis, DNADNA

Identifiers

PMID36350674
PMCPMC9723615

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.