Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36353345›Full record

ReviewJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2022

The efficacy of hemodialysis on paraquat poisoning mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nastaran Eizadi-Mood, Danial Jaberi, Zahra Barouti, Alireza Rahimi, Marjan Mansourian, Gholamali Dorooshi, Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee, Sam Alfred

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Factors associated with refusing hemoperfusion in patients with acute paraquat poisoning.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nastaran Eizadi-MoodDepartment of Clinical Toxicology, Isfahan Clinical Toxicology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Danial JaberiSchool of Medicine, Isfahan Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Zahra BaroutiSchool of Medicine, Isfahan Medical School, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Alireza RahimiClinical Informationist Research Group, Health Information Technology Research Center, Faculty of Medical Management and Information Sciences, Isfahan University, Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Marjan MansourianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Gholamali DorooshiIsfahan Clinical Toxicology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Ali Mohammad SabzghabaeeIsfahan Clinical Toxicology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Sam AlfredDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Paraquat (PQ) poisoning is a serious public health concern, especially in developing countries, due to its easy access and lack of awareness of potential harms. No effective treatment has been reported yet. Conventional hemodialysis (HD) is still used in many centers for excreting PQ or reducing acute kidney injury, but there is no consensus on its efficacy. Therefore, we aimed to review the HD efficacy in PQ poisoning mortality. Materials and Methods: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Excerpta Medical Database, Google Scholar, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, Pro-Quest, ScienceDirect, Springer, Clinical Key, Scientific Information Database, Magiran, and Iran-doc, in publications before January 1, 2020. We compared patients who underwent HD (Group 1) with those who did not (Group 2). The outcome was considered mortality/survival. The data were analyzed by Comprehensive Meta-analysis Software. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included five studies with a combined total of 203 patients. The patients in the Group 1 had higher mortality than Group 2 (odds ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-6.64; Conclusion: Although HD did not affect the survival of patients, other variables such as the amount of ingested PQ, poisoning severity, the time between PQ ingestion and the start of HD, duration, and times of HD sessions may influence the results regarding mortality.

Indexed as

Meta-analysismortalityparaquatpoisoningsurvivalsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36353345
PMCPMC9639714
OpenAlexW4308775121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.