Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36355520›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022

In Vitro, Molecular Docking and In Silico ADME/Tox Studies of Emodin and Chrysophanol against Human Colorectal and Cervical Carcinoma.

Wasim Ahmad, Mohammad Azam Ansari, Abdulrhman Alsayari, Dalia Almaghaslah, Shadma Wahab, Mohammad N Alomary, Qazi Mohammad Sajid Jamal, Firdos Alam Khan, Abuzer Ali, Prawez Alam and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Docking and Drug-Likeness ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Complement System Inhibitory Drugs in a Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Wasim AhmadDepartment of Pharmacy, Mohammed Al-Mana College for Medical Sciences, Dammam 34222, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2639-9200
Mohammad Azam AnsariDepartment of Epidemic Disease Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6122-5479
Abdulrhman AlsayariDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-9319
Dalia AlmaghaslahDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-0808
Shadma WahabDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9941-2918
Mohammad N AlomaryNational Centre for Biotechnology, King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh 11442, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7909-4377
Qazi Mohammad Sajid JamalDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, Qassim University, Al Bukayriyah 52741, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-708X
Firdos Alam KhanDepartment of Stem Cell Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-1530
Abuzer AliDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-4313-3896
Prawez AlamDepartment of Pharmacognosy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11941, Saudi Arabia.
Abozer Y ElderderyDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-5312
King Khalid University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAJouf University · SAKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology · SAPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAQassim University · SATaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthraquinones (AQs) are present in foods, dietary supplements, pharmaceuticals, and traditional treatments and have a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities. In the search for anti-cancer drugs, AQ derivatives are an important class. In this study, anthraquinone aglycons chrysophanol (Chr), emodin (EM) and FDA-approved anticancer drug fluorouracil were analyzed by molecular docking studies against receptor molecules caspase-3, apoptosis regulator Bcl-2, TRAF2 and NCK-interacting protein kinase (TNIK) and cyclin-dependent protein kinase 2 (CDK2) as novel candidates for future anticancer therapeutic development. The ADMET SAR database was used to predict the toxicity profile and pharmacokinetics of the Chr and EM. Furthermore, in silico results were validated by the in vitro anticancer activity against HCT-116 and HeLa cell lines to determine the anticancer effect. According to the docking studies simulated by the docking program AutoDock Vina 4.0, Chr and EM had good binding energies against the target proteins. It has been observed that Chr and EM show stronger molecular interaction than that of the FDA-approved anticancer drug fluorouracil. In the in vitro results, Chr and EM demonstrated promising anticancer activity in HCT-116 and HeLa cells. These findings lay the groundwork for the potential use of Chr and EM in the treatment of human colorectal and cervical carcinomas.

Indexed as

cervical carcinomachrysophanolcolorectal canceremodinin silico

Identifiers

PMID36355520
PMCPMC9697597
OpenAlexW4308120369

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.