Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36356822›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Neurometabolic timecourse of healthy aging.

Tao Gong, Steve C N Hui, Helge J Zöllner, Mark Britton, Yulu Song, Yufan Chen, Aaron T Gudmundson, Kathleen E Hupfeld, Christopher W Davies-Jenkins, Saipavitra Murali-Manohar and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neurobiology of aging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A data-driven algorithm to determineMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Age dependency of neurometabolite TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Metabolite TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Tao GongDepartments of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China; Departments of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China.
Steve C N HuiThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Helge J ZöllnerThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Mark BrittonCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; McKnight Brain Research Foundation, University of Florida, FL, United States of America; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Yulu SongThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Yufan ChenDepartments of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China.
Aaron T GudmundsonDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Kathleen E HupfeldThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Christopher W Davies-JenkinsThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Saipavitra Murali-ManoharThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Eric C PorgesCenter for Cognitive Aging and Memory, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; McKnight Brain Research Foundation, University of Florida, FL, United States of America; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Georg OeltzschnerThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Weibo ChenPhilips Healthcare, Shanghai, China.
Guangbin WangDepartments of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China; Departments of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China. Electronic address: wgb7932596@hotmail.com.
Richard A E EddenThe Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America; F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USShandong First Medical University · CNMcKnight Brain Research Foundation · USPhilips (China) · CNShandong University · CNUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

TRD 4: Platforms for multi-modal and multi-scale imaging dataP41EB031771 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Peter CM Van Zijl · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
Universal GABA-edited MRS at 3TR01EB016089 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard Anthony Edward Edden · 2013 to 2026
$5.4M
Simultaneous Hadamard Editing of GABA and GlutathioneR01EB023963 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EDDEN, RICHARD ANTHONY EDWARD · 2017 to 2024
$3.8M
Translational Science Training to Reduce the Impact of Alcohol on HIV InfectionT32AA025877 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Robert L Cook, DEBRA E LYON · 2018 to 2026
$3.3M
Towards a comprehensive neurometabolic profile in patients with mild cognitive impairment.R00AG062230 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI OELTZSCHNER, GEORG · 2021 to 2023
$735k
Neurometabolic profile of mild cognitive impairment using multiplexed edited MRSR21AG060245 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EDDEN, RICHARD ANTHONY EDWARD · 2018 to 2019
$466k
Individual Differences in GABA and Functional NeuroimagingR21NS077300 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EDDEN, RICHARD ANTHONY EDWARD · 2012 to 2013
$452k
Cortical Inhibition and Mobility in Older AdultsK00AG068440 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HUPFELD, KATHLEEN ELIZABETH · 2022 to 2024
$222k
Cortical Inhibition and Mobility in Older AdultsF99AG068440 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HUPFELD, KATHLEEN ELIZABETH · 2020 to 2021
$84k
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA025877NIA NIH HHS F99 AG068440NIA NIH HHS K00 AG068440NIA NIH HHS R00 AG062230NIA NIH HHS R21 AG060245NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031771NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016089NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023963NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS077300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe neurometabolic timecourse of healthy aging is not well-established, in part due to diversity of quantification methodology. In this study, a large structured cross-sectional cohort of male and female subjects throughout adulthood was recruited to investigate neurometabolic changes as a function of age, using consensus-recommended magnetic resonance spectroscopy quantification methods.

methods102 healthy volunteers, with approximately equal numbers of male and female participants in each decade of age from the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s, were recruited with IRB approval. MR spectroscopic data were acquired on a 3T MRI scanner. Metabolite spectra were acquired using PRESS localization (TE=30 ms; 96 transients) in the centrum semiovale (CSO) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC). Water-suppressed spectra were modeled using the Osprey algorithm, employing a basis set of 18 simulated metabolite basis functions and a cohort-mean measured macromolecular spectrum. Pearson correlations were conducted to assess relationships between metabolite concentrations and age for each voxel; Spearman correlations were conducted where metabolite distributions were non-normal. Paired t-tests were run to determine whether metabolite concentrations differed between the PCC and CSO. Finally, robust linear regressions were conducted to assess both age and sex as predictors of metabolite concentrations in the PCC and CSO and separately, to assess age, signal-noise ratio, and full width half maximum (FWHM) linewidth as predictors of metabolite concentrations.

resultsData from four voxels were excluded (2 ethanol; 2 unacceptably large lipid signal). Statistically-significant age*metabolite Pearson correlations were observed for tCho (r(98)=0.33, p<0.001), tCr (r(98)=0.60, p<0.001), and mI (r(98)=0.32, p=0.001) in the CSO and for NAAG (r(98)=0.26, p=0.008), tCho(r(98)=0.33, p<0.001), tCr (r(98)=0.39, p<0.001), and Gln (r(98)=0.21, p=0.034) in the PCC. Spearman correlations for non-normal variables revealed a statistically significant correlation between sI and age in the CSO (r(86)=0.26, p=0.013). No significant correlations were seen between age and tNAA, NAA, Glx, Glu, GSH, PE, Lac, or Asp in either region (all p>0.20). Age associations for tCho, tCr, mI and sI in the CSO and for NAAG, tCho, and tCr in the PCC remained when controlling for sex in robust regressions. CSO NAAG and Asp, as well as PCC tNAA, sI, and Lac were higher in women; PCC Gln was higher in men. When including an age*sex interaction term in robust regression models, a significant age*sex interaction was seen for tCho (F(1,96)=11.53, p=0.001) and GSH (F(1,96)=7.15, p=0.009) in the CSO and tCho (F(1,96)=9.17, p=0.003), tCr (F(1,96)=9.59, p=0.003), mI (F(1,96)=6.48, p=0.012), and Lac (F(1,78)=6.50, p=0.016) in the PCC. In all significant interactions, metabolite levels increased with age in females, but not males. There was a significant positive correlation between linewidth and age. Age relationships with tCho, tCr, and mI in the CSO and tCho, tCr, mI, and sI in the PCC were significant after controlling for linewidth and FWHM in robust regressions.

conclusionThe primary (correlation) results indicated age relationships for tCho, tCr, mI, and sI in the CSO and for NAAG, tCho, tCr, and Gln in the PCC, while no age correlations were found for tNAA, NAA, Glx, Glu, GSH, PE, Lac, or Asp in either region. Our results provide a normative foundation for future work investigating the neurometabolic time course of healthy aging using MRS.

Indexed as

Gyrus CinguliMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAlgorithmsAspartic AcidCholineCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleAspartic AcidCholinehealthy agingmagnetic resonance spectroscopyneurometabolitePRESS

Identifiers

PMID36356822
PMCPMC9902072
OpenAlexW4308389032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.