Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36358450›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Flow Diverter Devices in the Treatment of Anterior Communicating Artery Region Aneurysms: Would the Regional Anatomy and the Aneurysm Location Affect the Outcomes?

Mariangela Piano, Pietro Trombatore, Emilio Lozupone, Guglielmo Pero, Amedeo Cervo, Antonio Macera, Luca Quilici, Simone Peschillo, Luca Valvassori, Edoardo Boccardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mariangela PianoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milano, Italy.
Pietro TrombatoreDepartment of Neuroradiology, Ospedale San Gerardo, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Emilio LozuponeDepartment of Neuroradiology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Guglielmo PeroDepartment of Neuroradiology, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8932-6909
Amedeo CervoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-9929
Antonio MaceraDepartment of Neuroradiology, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milano, Italy.
Luca QuiliciDepartment of Neuroradiology, ASST Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24127 Bergamo, Italy.
Simone PeschilloDepartment of Neurosurgey, UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3920-8517
Luca ValvassoriDepartment of Neuroradiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Edoardo BoccardiDepartment of Neuroradiology, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milano, Italy.
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITOspedale San Paolo · ITOspedale Vito Fazzi · ITSaint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy and the safety of flow diverter devices (FDD) in anterior communicating artery (ACoA) region aneurysms, focusing on anatomical factors that could affect the outcome, such as the location of the aneurysm along the ACoA (centered on ACoA or decentered on the A1-A2 junction) and the anatomy of the ACoA region.

methodsClinical, procedural and follow-up data were analyzed. Aneurysms were classified according to the location along the ACoA (centered or decentered on the A1-A2 junction) and on the basis of the anatomical configuration of the ACoA region. Safety was assessed by recording intraprocedural, periprocedural and delayed complications to determine the morbidity and mortality rates. The functional outcome was evaluated with the modified Rankin scale (mRS) prior to and after the endovascular procedure. To assess the efficacy, midterm and long-term clinical, angiographic and cross-sectional imaging follow-ups were recorded. Subgroup analysis according to the different ACoA regional anatomical configurations and the ACoA aneurysm locations were performed.

results33 patients (17 males; 16 females) with ACoA region aneurysms were treated with FDDs. 27 aneurysms were located at the A1-A2 junction (82%) while the remaining six aneurysms were centered on the ACoA. No mortality was recorded. The overall morbidity rate was 6% (2/33 procedures). Major complications occurred in 33% (2/6) of ACoA aneurysms and in the 0% of A1-A2 junction aneurysms. Mid-term and long-term neuroimaging follow-ups showed the occlusion of the aneurysm in 28/33 cases (85%). Complete occlusion rates were 93% in the A1-A2 junction aneurysms and 50% in ACoA aneurysms.

conclusionsThe FDD is a safe and effective tool that can be used in the treatment of selected cases of ACoA region aneurysms. The location of the aneurysm along the ACoA and the regional anatomy of the ACoA complex could affect the efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

anterior communicating arterybrain aneurysmendovascular treatmentflow diverter

Identifiers

PMID36358450
PMCPMC9688233
OpenAlexW4308771764

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.