ReviewCancers2022
Liquid Biopsy in Cancer: Focus on Lymphoproliferative Disorders.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid Biopsy in B and T Cell Lymphomas: From Bench to Bedside.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Advancing Leukemia Management Through Liquid Biopsy: Insights into Biomarkers and Clinical Utility.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
- Editorial: Liquid biopsies in hematological malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Within the context of precision medicine, the scientific community is giving particular attention to early diagnosis and intervention, guided by non-invasive methodologies. Liquid biopsy (LBx) is a recent laboratory approach consisting of a non-invasive blood draw, which allows the detection of information about potential prognostic factors, or markers to be used for diagnostic purposes; it might also allow the clinician to establish a treatment regimen and predict a patient's response. Since the discovery of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the nineteenth century, the possibility of integrating LBx into clinical practice has been explored, primarily because of its safeness and easy execution: indeed, compared to solid biopsy, sampling-related risks are less of a concern, and the quickness and repeatability of the process could help confirm a prompt diagnosis or to further corroborate the existence of a metastatic spreading of the disease. LBx's usefulness has been consolidated in a narrow range of oncological settings, first of all, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and it is now gradually being assessed also in lymphoproliferative diseases, such as acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), B-cell lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. The present review aims to summarize LBx's overall characteristics (such as its advantages and flaws, collection and analysis methodologies, indications, and targets of the test), and to highlight the applications of this technique within the specific field of B-cell malignancies. The perspectives on how such a simple and convenient technique could improve hemato-oncological clinical practice are broadly encouraging, yet far from a complete integration in routine clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.