Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36360599›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Early vs. Late Gestational Diabetes: Comparison between Two Groups Diagnosed by Abnormal Initial Fasting Plasma Glucose or Mid-Pregnancy Oral Glucose Tolerance Test.

Tatiana Assuncao Zaccara, Cristiane Freitas Paganoti, Fernanda C Ferreira Mikami, Rossana P Vieira Francisco, Rafaela Alkmin Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Colostral Appetite-Regulating Adipokines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tatiana Assuncao ZaccaraDepartamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1738-1244
Cristiane Freitas PaganotiDivisao de Clinica Obstetrica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.
Fernanda C Ferreira MikamiDivisao de Clinica Obstetrica do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8254-9002
Rossana P Vieira FranciscoDepartamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9981-8069
Rafaela Alkmin CostaDepartamento de Obstetricia e Ginecologia da Faculdade de Medicina da, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05403-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8828-6725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common complications in pregnancy. It may be diagnosed using a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) early in pregnancy (eGDM) or a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (late GDM). This retrospective cohort of women with GDM presents data from 1891 patients (1004 in the eGDM and 887 in the late GDM group). Student's t-test, chi-squared or Fisher's exact test and the Bonferroni test for post hoc analysis were used to compare the groups. Women with eGDM had higher pre-pregnancy BMI, more frequent family history of DM, more frequent history of previous GDM, and were more likely to have chronic hypertension. They were more likely to deliver by cesarean section and to present an abnormal puerperal OGTT. Even though they received earlier treatment and required insulin more frequently, there was no difference in neonatal outcomes. Diagnosing and treating GDM is necessary to reduce complications and adverse outcomes, but it is still a challenge. We believe that women with eGDM should be treated and closely monitored, even though this may increase healthcare-related costs.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalGlucose IntoleranceBlood GlucoseCesarean SectionFastingFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesBlood Glucoseearly-onset GDMgestational diabetesIADPSGoral glucose tolerance test

Identifiers

PMID36360599
PMCPMC9657117

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.