Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36364958›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

Not Another Caffeine Effect on Sports Performance Study-Nothing New or More to Do?

Jason Tallis, Lucas Guimaraes-Ferreira, Neil D Clarke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Soccer pass performance following caffeine intake with deliberate or maintenance practice.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Caffeine's influence on vertical jump height: a real-life collegiate student-athlete approach.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason TallisResearch Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-2693
Lucas Guimaraes-FerreiraResearch Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2970-7355
Neil D ClarkeResearch Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1909-329X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance-enhancing potential of acute caffeine consumption is firmly established with benefits for many aspects of physical performance and cognitive function summarised in a number of meta-analyses. Despite this, there remains near exponential growth in research articles examining the ergogenic effects of caffeine. Many such studies are confirmatory of well-established ideas, and with a wealth of convincing evidence available, the value of further investigation may be questioned. However, several important knowledge gaps remain. As such, the purpose of this review is to summarise key knowledge gaps regarding the current understanding of the performance-enhancing effect of caffeine and justify their value for future investigation. The review will provide a particular focus on ten research priorities that will aid in the translation of caffeine's ergogenic potential to real-world sporting scenarios. The discussion presented here is therefore essential in guiding the design of future work that will aid in progressing the current understanding of the effects of caffeine as a performance enhancer.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformancePerformance-Enhancing SubstancesCaffeineCaffeinePerformance-Enhancing Substancescaffeinefuture research directionssports performance

Identifiers

PMID36364958
PMCPMC9658326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.