Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36372807›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological physics2022

A pilot study of ion current estimation by ANN from action potential waveforms.

Sevgi Şengül Ayan, Selim Süleymanoğlu, Hasan Özdoğan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sevgi Şengül AyanDepartment of Engineering, Industrial Engineering, Antalya Bilim University, Döşemealtı, Antalya, Turkey. sevgi.sengul@antalya.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0003-0083-4446
Selim SüleymanoğluDepartment of Engineering, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Antalya Bilim University, Döşemealtı, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8372-8993
Hasan ÖzdoğanDepartment of Medical Imaging Techniques, Vocational School of Health Services, Antalya Bilim University, Döşemealtı, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6127-9680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiments using conventional experimental approaches to capture the dynamics of ion channels are not always feasible, and even when possible and feasible, some can be time-consuming. In this work, the ionic current-time dynamics during cardiac action potentials (APs) are predicted from a single AP waveform by means of artificial neural networks (ANNs). The data collection is accomplished by the use of a single-cell model to run electrophysiological simulations in order to identify ionic currents based on fluctuations in ion channel conductance. The relevant ionic currents, as well as the corresponding cardiac AP, are then calculated and fed into the ANN algorithm, which predicts the desired currents solely based on the AP curve. The validity of the proposed methodology for the Bayesian approach is demonstrated by the R (validation) scores obtained from training data, test data, and the entire data set. The Bayesian regularization's (BR) strength and dependability are further supported by error values and the regression presentations, all of which are positive indicators. As a result of the high convergence between the simulated currents and the currents generated by including the efficacy of a developed Bayesian solver, it is possible to generate behavior of ionic currents during time for the desired AP waveform for any electrical excitable cell.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsBayes TheoremPilot ProjectsArtificial neural networksBayesian regularizationCardiac action potentialCurrent–time dynamicsNumerical modeling

Identifiers

PMID36372807
PMCPMC9727005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.