Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36379683›Full record

ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2023

A cryptic EWSR1::DDIT3 fusion in myxoid liposarcoma: Potential pitfalls with FISH and cytogenetics.

Sebastian Ibstedt, Camila Bedeschi Rego de Mattos, Jan Köster, Fredrik Mertens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian IbstedtDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5097-9243
Camila Bedeschi Rego de MattosOrthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Jan KösterDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik MertensDepartment of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) is molecularly characterized by fusions involving the DDIT3 gene in chromosome band 12q13; the fusion partner is FUS in band 16p11 in 90-95% of the cases and EWSR1 in band 22q12 in the remaining 5-10%. Hence, molecular studies, often fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for DDIT3 rearrangement, are useful for establishing a correct diagnosis. Although all MLS tumors should have DDIT3 fusions, it is important to be aware of reasons for potential false-negative results. We here present a case of MLS that was negative for FISH for DDIT3, that showed an unexpected t(11;22) at G-banding, but that displayed a characteristic EWSR1::DDIT3 fusion at RNA-sequencing. The results suggest that neoplasia-associated fusions that, due to the transcriptional orientations of the two genes involved, cannot arise through only two double-strand breaks are more likely to be associated with negative FISH-findings and unexpected karyotypes.

Indexed as

LiposarcomaLiposarcoma, MyxoidAdultBase SequenceHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOncogene Proteins, FusionRNA-Binding Protein EWSTranscription Factor CHOPDDIT3 protein, humanEWSR1 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionRNA-Binding Protein EWSTranscription Factor CHOPcrypticFISHfusionliposarcomatranscriptional orientation

Identifiers

PMID36379683
PMCPMC10100227
OpenAlexW4309164576

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.