Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36386798›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2022

Modification mapping by nanopore sequencing.

Laura K White, Jay R Hesselberth

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Detection ofFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epitranscriptomic alterations induced by environmental toxins: implications for RNA modifications and disease.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Exploring the mFunctional & integrative genomics · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura K WhiteDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, RNA Bioscience Initiative, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Jay R HesselberthDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, RNA Bioscience Initiative, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Nanopore analysis of transfer RNA forms and functionsR35GM119550 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Jay R Hesselberth · 2016 to 2026
$4.5M
Predoctoral Training Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology (Supplement: Mentoring in the Research Environment)T32GM136444 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MICHAEL A MCMURRAY, Rytis Prekeris · 2020 to 2026
$3.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119550NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has provided biologists with an unprecedented view into biological processes and their regulation over the past 2 decades, fueling a wave of development of high throughput methods based on short read DNA and RNA sequencing. For nucleic acid modifications, NGS has been coupled with immunoprecipitation, chemical treatment, enzymatic treatment, and/or the use of reverse transcriptase enzymes with fortuitous activities to enrich for and to identify covalent modifications of RNA and DNA. However, the majority of nucleic acid modifications lack commercial monoclonal antibodies, and mapping techniques that rely on chemical or enzymatic treatments to manipulate modification signatures add additional technical complexities to library preparation. Moreover, such approaches tend to be specific to a single class of RNA or DNA modification, and generate only indirect readouts of modification status. Third generation sequencing technologies such as the commercially available "long read" platforms from Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies are an attractive alternative for high throughput detection of nucleic acid modifications. While the former can indirectly sense modified nucleotides through changes in the kinetics of reverse transcription reactions, nanopore sequencing can in principle directly detect any nucleic acid modification that produces a signal distortion as the nucleic acid passes through a nanopore sensor embedded within a charged membrane. To date, more than a dozen endogenous DNA and RNA modifications have been interrogated by nanopore sequencing, as well as a number of synthetic nucleic acid modifications used in metabolic labeling, structure probing, and other emerging applications. This review is intended to introduce the reader to nanopore sequencing and key principles underlying its use in direct detection of nucleic acid modifications in unamplified DNA or RNA samples, and outline current approaches for detecting and quantifying nucleic acid modifications by nanopore sequencing. As this technology matures, we anticipate advances in both sequencing chemistry and analysis methods will lead to rapid improvements in the identification and quantification of these epigenetic marks.

Indexed as

DNAmodificationnanoporeRNAsequencing

Identifiers

PMID36386798
PMCPMC9650216
OpenAlexW4307707392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.