Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36387309›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2022

Quantifying Aerosol Generation in Maxillofacial Trauma Repair Techniques.

Adam McCann, Kyle Singerman, James Coxe, John Singletary, Jun Wang, Ryan Collar, Tsung-Yen Hsieh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam McCannDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Kyle SingermanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
James CoxeDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
John SingletaryDepartment of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jun WangDepartment of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ryan CollarDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Tsung-Yen HsiehDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3883-8397
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Cadaveric simulation study. Objective: The novel coronavirus (COVID-19), which can be transmitted via aerosolized viral particles, has directed focus on protection of healthcare workers during procedures involving the upper aerodigestive tract, including maxillofacial trauma repair. This study evaluates particle generation at different distances from open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of maxillofacial injuries in the intraoperative setting to reduce the risk of contracting airborne diseases such as COVID-19. Methods: Two cadaveric specimens in a simulated operating room underwent ORIF of midface and mandible fractures via intraoral incisions as well as maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using hybrid arch bars. ORIF was performed with both self-drilling screws and with the use of a power drill for creating guide holes. Real-time aerosol concentration was measured throughout each procedure using 3 particle counters placed 0.45, 1.68, and 3.81 m (1.5, 5.5, and 12.5 feet, respectively) from the operative site. Results: There was a significant decrease in particle concentration in all procedures at 1.68 m compared to 0.45 m, but only 2 of the 5 procedures showed further significant decrease in particle concentration when going from 1.68 to 3.81 m from the operative site. There was significantly less particle concentration generated at all distances when using self-drilling techniques compared to power drilling for ORIF. Conclusions: Consideration of using self-drilling screwing techniques as well as maintaining physical distancing protocols may decrease risk of transmission of airborne diseases such as COVID-19 while in the intraoperative setting.

Indexed as

aerosolizationCOVID-19maxillofacial traumaopen reduction internal fixationparticle concentration

Identifiers

PMID36387309
PMCPMC9647378
OpenAlexW4206604852

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.