ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Dynamic structures and emerging trends in the management of major trauma: A bibliometric analysis of publications between 2012 and 2021.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge mapping of photodynamic therapy in bladder cancer: a bibliometric analysis (2000-2025).Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Application and observation of hemostatic effect of independently developed hemostatic equipment in a lethal swine exsanguination model.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Mapping Trends Regarding the Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles.Emergency medicine international · 2025Article
- A bibliometric analysis of gene editing and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (from 2004 to 2024).Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Trends and Hotspots in the Health Economics Evaluation of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- Review
- Global research trends and focus on the link between colorectal cancer and gut flora: a bibliometric analysis from 2001 to 2021.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Global trends in research related to functional dyspepsia and anxiety or depression over the past two decades: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Major trauma is currently a global public health issue with a massive impact on health at both the individual and population levels. However, there are limited bibliometric analyses on the management of major trauma. Thus, in this study we aimed to identify global research trends, dynamic structures, and scientific frontiers in the management of major trauma between 2012 and 2021. Methods: We searched the Web of Science Core Collection to access articles and reviews concerning the management of major traumas and conducted a bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace. Results: Overall, 2,585 studies were screened and published by 403 institutions from 110 countries/regions. The most productive country and institution in this field of research were the USA and Monash University, respectively. Rolf Lefering was the most prolific researcher and Holcomb JB had the most co-citations. Conclusion: The dynamic structures and emerging trends in the management of major trauma were extensively analyzed using CiteSpace, a visualization software. Based on the analysis, the following research hotspots emerged: management of severe traumatic brain injury and massive hemorrhage, neurocritical care, injury severity, and emergency medical service. Our findings provide pertinent information for future research and contribute toward policy making in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.