Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36389443›Full record

ReviewImmuno-oncology technology2022

ATMP development and pre-GMP environment in academia: a safety net for early cell and gene therapy development and manufacturing.

D N Silva, M Chrobok, G Ahlén, P Blomberg, M Sällberg, A Pasetto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immuno-oncology technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Redefining quality in cell and gene therapies: Lessons from implementing electronic QMS in academic cGMP facility.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Developing Advanced Chimeric Cell Therapy for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D N SilvaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
M ChrobokDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
G AhlénDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
P BlombergDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
M SällbergDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
A PasettoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP) are medicines for human use that are based on genes, cells or tissues. Over the past years, an increasing number of ATMP entered the market for treatment of cancer, genetic disorders, skeletal defects and metabolic diseases. However, the ATMP production methods often change from the initial concept to commercialization. This change is needed to improve the manufacturing feasibility for scaling up or scaling out. Moreover, the production must adhere to current good manufacturing practices (GMP), and needs to follow a risk-based approach, which often is challenging to implement due to the novelty of the products. Since most of the early ATMP development is done in academia, an environment that is not familiar with regulatory requirements for ATMP production in GMP, the initial manufacturing choice for pre-clinical studies is usually very different from what is required for clinical use. This leads to a lengthy production process optimization, unnecessary repetition of experiments and ultimately waste of funding. This consideration prompted us to provide an intermediate step between early ATMP production in research settings to GMP manufacturing. We built a dedicated facility, and we called this environment 'pre-GMP' to highlight that it is a step toward preparation to GMP manufacturing. This environment supports process development and provides a manufacturing fitness room before transferring to GMP suites. This paper addresses the relevance of pre-GMP, underlining the advantages and the possible disadvantages of this additional framework that may be key in accelerating the pace of ATMP toward clinic.

Indexed as

ATMPpre-GMPprocess developmentregulatory support

Identifiers

PMID36389443
PMCPMC9650027

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.