Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36399413›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2022

Chemical-protein relation extraction with ensembles of carefully tuned pretrained language models.

Leon Weber, Mario Sänger, Samuele Garda, Fabio Barth, Christoph Alt, Ulf Leser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomedical relation extraction with knowledge base-refined weak supervision.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leon WeberComputer Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2499-472X
Mario SängerComputer Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2950-2587
Samuele GardaComputer Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany.
Fabio BarthComputer Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany.
Christoph AltComputer Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany.
Ulf LeserComputer Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin 10099, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of chemical-protein interactions described in the literature is an important task with applications in drug design, precision medicine and biotechnology. Manual extraction of such relationships from the biomedical literature is costly and often prohibitively time-consuming. The BioCreative VII DrugProt shared task provides a benchmark for methods for the automated extraction of chemical-protein relations from scientific text. Here we describe our contribution to the shared task and report on the achieved results. We define the task as a relation classification problem, which we approach with pretrained transformer language models. Upon this basic architecture, we experiment with utilizing textual and embedded side information from knowledge bases as well as additional training data to improve extraction performance. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed model and the individual extensions including an extensive hyperparameter search leading to 2647 different runs. We find that ensembling and choosing the right pretrained language model are crucial for optimal performance, whereas adding additional data and embedded side information did not improve results. Our best model is based on an ensemble of 10 pretrained transformers and additional textual descriptions of chemicals taken from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database. The model reaches an F1 score of 79.73% on the hidden DrugProt test set and achieves the first rank out of 107 submitted runs in the official evaluation. Database URL: https://github.com/leonweber/drugprot.

Indexed as

LanguageProteinsDatabases, FactualToxicogeneticsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36399413
PMCPMC9674024
OpenAlexW4309659061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.