Evidence mapPaperPMID 36404346Full record

SynthesisPediatric cardiology2023

Risk Factors for Tube Feeding at Discharge in Infants Undergoing Neonatal Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.

Kristin M Elgersma, Anna L Trebilcock, Mary O Whipple, Lynn R Tanner, Sarah J Pilditch, Kavisha M Shah, Anne Chevalier McKechnie

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pediatric cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Human milk and breastfeeding at the first oral feed for infants with critical congenital heart disease: a multi-institutional study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin M ElgersmaUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA. elger005@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6559-0812
Anna L TrebilcockUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mary O WhippleUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lynn R TannerUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sarah J PilditchUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Kavisha M ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, M Health Fairview University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Anne Chevalier McKechnieUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 30-50% of infants undergoing neonatal surgery for congenital heart disease (CHD) cannot meet oral feeding goals by discharge and require feeding tube support at home. Feeding tubes are associated with increased readmission rates and consequent hospital, payer, and family costs, and are a burden for family caregivers. Identification of modifiable risk factors for oral feeding problems could support targeted care for at-risk infants. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to determine risk factors for tube feeding at discharge in infants undergoing neonatal surgery for CHD. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Studies published before 2010 were excluded. The search resulted in 607 records, of which 18 were included. Studies were primarily retrospective cohort designs and results were often inconsistent. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tools. As a group, the studies exhibited substantial risk for bias. Based on the findings, infants who struggle with feeding preoperatively, experience increased nil per os duration and/or low oral feeding volume postoperatively, experience increased duration of mechanical ventilation, or have vocal cord dysfunction may be at risk for tube feeding at hospital discharge. Factors warranting further examination include cardiac physiology (e.g., aortic arch obstruction) and the relationship between neurodevelopment and oral feeding. Clinicians should use caution in assuming risk for an individual and prioritize early implementation of interventions that facilitate oral feeding development.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsCardiac surgeryCongenital heart diseaseFeedingInfantNeonateRisk factorsTube feeding

Identifiers

PMID36404346
OpenAlexW4309515034

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.