ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2023
Evaluation of somatic and/or germline mosaicism in congenital malformation of the eye.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The RaDiCo information system for rare disease cohorts.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Molecular explanations for variability of clinical phenotypes.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microphthalmia, Anophthalmia and Coloboma (MAC) form a spectrum of congenital eye malformations responsible for severe visual impairment. Despite the exploration of hundreds of genes by High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS), most of the patients remain without genetic diagnosis. One explanation could be the not yet demonstrated involvement of somatic mosaicism (undetected by conventional analysis pipelines) in those patients. Furthermore, the proportion of parental germline mosaicism in presumed de novo variations is still unknown in ocular malformations. Thus, using dedicated bioinformatics pipeline designed to detect mosaic variants, we reanalysed the sequencing data obtained from a 119 ocular development genes panel performed on blood samples of 78 probands with sporadic MAC without genetic diagnosis. Using the same HTS strategy, we sequenced 80 asymptomatic parents of 41 probands carrying a disease-causing variant in an ocular development gene considered de novo after Sanger sequencing of both parents. Reanalysis of the previously sequencing data did not find any mosaic variant in probands without genetic diagnosis. However, HTS of parents revealed undetected SOX2 and PAX6 mosaic variants in two parents. Finally, this work, performed on two large cohorts of patients with MAC spectrum, provides for the first time an overview of the interest of looking for mosaicism in ocular development disorders. Somatic mosaicism does not appear to be frequent in MAC spectrum and might explain only few diagnoses. Thus, other approaches such as whole genome sequencing should be considered in those patients. Parental mosaicism is however not that rare (around 5%) and challenging for genetic counselling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.