ArticleChinese herbal medicines2022
Integrating systematic pharmacology-based strategy and experimental validation to explore mechanism of
Article in Chinese herbal medicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of various immunosuppressive agents for pediatric Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (IgA vasculitis nephritis) in Chinese children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Comprehensive Quantification of Oligoasthenozoospermia Induced by Obesity, Reproductive Toxicants, and Their Combination in Rat Models.Andrology · 2026Article
- Herbal remedies for hepatic diseases: A review of medicinal herbs in the treatment of liver disorders.Chinese herbal medicines · 2026Review
- Precise subcellular organelle-targeted analyses of hepatotoxicity ofChinese herbal medicines · 2026Article
- Hua-Zhuo-Ning-Fu Decoction Ameliorates Psoriasis by Inhibiting TNF-Α/IL-6 and PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway: A Network Pharmacology Approach and Experimental Validation.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
- Systematic elucidation of the effective constituents and potential mechanisms ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Bioinformatics based exploration of the anti-NAFLD mechanism of Wang's empirical formula via TLR4/NF-κB/COX2 pathway.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Interaction ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Methods: Network pharmacology was used to determine the potential targets of bile duct injury caused by TG. Next, the hepatotoxic effects of TG, triptolide (TP) and celastrol (CEL) were investigated and compared Results: Based on the network pharmacological analysis of 12 bioactive ingredients found in TG, a total of 35 targets and 15 pathways related to bile duct injury were obtained. Both TG and TP resulted in cholangiocyte damage and liver injury, as illustrated by increased levels of serum transaminase and oxidative stress, stimulated portal edema and lymphocytic infiltration and decreased expression of cholangiocyte marker, cytoskeletal 19. In addition, TG and TP inhibited cell proliferation and migration, arrested cell cycle and promoted Caspase-dependent apoptosis of cholangiocytes Conclusion: We revealed that TG-stimulated liver injury was specifically characterized by cholangiocyte damage and TP might be the decisive ingredient to reflect TG hepatotoxicity. Our results not only provide novel insights into the mechanism underlying the hepatotoxicity effects of TG but also offer reference for clinical rational use of TG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.