Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36407298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A two-sample Mendelian Randomization analysis in the European population.

Ming-Gang Deng, Han-Tao Cui, Yong-Bing Lan, Jia-Qi Nie, Yue-Hui Liang, Chen Chai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Home-Based Behaviour Change Intervention With Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity in People With Stroke and Diabetes-A Feasibility and Safety Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming-Gang DengSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Han-Tao CuiSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yong-Bing LanDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jia-Qi NieSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Yue-Hui LiangSchool of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Chen ChaiEmergency Center, Hubei Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Resuscitation, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviors (SB) have been linked to the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in observational studies; however, it is unclear whether these associations are causative or confounded. This study intends to use summary genetic data from the UK Biobank and other consortiums in conjunction with the two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to solve this problem. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) technique was utilized as the primary analysis, with sensitivity analyses using the MR-Egger, weighted-median, and MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (PRESSO) techniques. Inverse associations between self-reported moderate PA (OR: 0.3096, 95% CI: 0.1782-0.5380) and vigorous PA (OR: 0.2747, 95% CI: 0.1390-0.5428) with T2DM risk were found, respectively. However, accelerometer-based PA measurement (average acceleration) was not associated with T2DM risk (OR: 1.0284, 95% CI: 0.9831-1.0758). The time (hours/day) spent watching TV was associated with T2DM risk (OR: 2.3490, 95% CI: 1.9084-2.8915), while the time (hours/day) spent using the computer (OR: 0.8496, 95% CI: 0.7178-1.0056), and driving (OR: 3.0679, 95% CI: 0.8448-11.1415) were not associated with T2DM risk. The sensitivity analysis revealed relationships of a similar magnitude. Our study revealed that more PA and less TV viewing were related to a decreased T2DM risk, and provided genetic support for a causal relationship between PA, TV viewing, and T2DM risk.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Mendelian Randomization AnalysisExerciseHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSedentary Behaviorcausal effectMendelian Randomizationphysical activitysedentary behaviorstype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36407298
PMCPMC9670309
OpenAlexW4308416179

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.