Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36408969›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2022

Human Bone Marrow Cell Extracts Mitigate Radiation Injury to Salivary Gland.

X Su, Y Liu, O ElKashty, J Seuntjens, K M Yamada, S D Tran

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of stem cells in treating xerostomia: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

X SuMcGill Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Y LiuMcGill Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
O ElKashtyMcGill Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
J SeuntjensGerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
K M YamadaCell Biology Section, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
S D TranMcGill Craniofacial Tissue Engineering and Stem Cells Laboratory, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4875-7534
McGill University · CAMansoura University · EGNational Institutes of Health · USSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

CIHR PJT-159577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitigation of irradiation injury to salivary glands was previously reported using a cell-free extract from mouse bone marrow. However, to bring this potential therapy a step closer to clinical application, a human bone marrow cell extract (BMCE) needs to be tested. Here, we report that irradiation-induced injury of salivary glands in immunocompetent mice treated with human BMCE secreted 50% more saliva than saline-injected mice, and BMCE did not cause additional acute inflammatory reaction. In addition, to identify the cell fraction in BMCE with the most therapeutic activity, we sorted human bone marrow into 3 cell fractions (mononuclear, granulocyte, and red blood cells) and tested their respective cell extracts. We identified that the mononuclear cell extract (MCE) provided the best therapeutic efficacy. It increased salivary flow 50% to 73% for 16 wk, preserved salivary parenchymal and stromal cells, and doubled cell proliferation rates while producing less inflammatory response. In contrast, the cell extract of granulocytes was of shorter efficacy and induced an acute inflammatory response, while that from red blood cells was not therapeutically effective for salivary function. Several proangiogenic (MMP-8, MMP-9, VEGF, uPA) and antiangiogenic factors (TSP-1, PF4, TIMP-1, PAI-1) were identified in MCE. Added advantages of BMCE and MCE for potential clinical use were that cell extracts from both male and female donors were comparably bioactive and that cell extracts could be stored and transported much more conveniently than cells. These findings suggest human BMCE, specifically the MCE fraction, is a promising therapy against irradiation-induced salivary hypofunction.

Indexed as

Radiation InjuriesSalivary GlandsAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell ExtractsFemaleHumansMaleMiceSalivaCell Extractsangiogenesisgrowth factor(s)inflammationregeneration medicinesalivatissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID36408969
PMCPMC9693900
OpenAlexW4295540315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.