Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36409033›Full record

ReviewAutophagy2023

Autophagic lysosome reformation in health and disease.

Randini Nanayakkara, Rajendra Gurung, Samuel J Rodgers, Matthew J Eramo, Georg Ramm, Christina A Mitchell, Meagan J McGrath

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autophagy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting Lysosomes for Enhanced Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Immune Response.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Randini NanayakkaraMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-8687
Rajendra GurungMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4125-634X
Samuel J RodgersMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7186-8355
Matthew J EramoMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-1589
Georg RammMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3596-2288
Christina A MitchellMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-3192
Meagan J McGrathMonash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-6558
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lysosomes are the primary degradative compartment within cells and there have been significant advances over the past decade toward understanding how lysosome homeostasis is maintained. Lysosome repopulation ensures sustained autophagy function, a fundamental process that protects against disease. During macroautophagy/autophagy, cellular debris is sequestered into phagophores that mature into autophagosomes, which then fuse with lysosomes to generate autolysosomes in which contents are degraded. Autophagy cannot proceed without the sufficient generation of lysosomes, and this can be achieved via their de novo biogenesis. Alternatively, during autophagic lysosome reformation (ALR), lysosomes are generated via the recycling of autolysosome membranes. During this process, autolysosomes undergo significant membrane remodeling and scission to generate membrane fragments, that mature into functional lysosomes. By utilizing membranes already formed during autophagy, this facilitates an efficient pathway for re-deriving lysosomes, particularly under conditions of prolonged autophagic flux. ALR dysfunction is emerging as an important disease mechanism including for neurodegenerative disorders such as hereditary spastic paraplegia and Parkinson disease, neuropathies including Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, lysosome storage disorders, muscular dystrophy, metabolic syndrome, and inflammatory and liver disorders. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of ALR, including an overview of its dynamic spatiotemporal regulation by MTOR and phosphoinositides, and the role ALR dysfunction plays in many diseases.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseSpastic Paraplegia, HereditaryAutophagosomesAutophagyHumansIntracellular MembranesLysosomesAutophagic lysosome reformationlysosomeMTORphosphoinositidePtdIns(4,5)P2PtdIns4P

Identifiers

PMID36409033
PMCPMC10240999
OpenAlexW4309518906

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.