Evidence mapPaperPMID 36409442Full record

SynthesisCurrent obesity reports2022

A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Non-surgical Weight Management for Adults with Severe Obesity: What is Cost Effective and What are the Implications for the Design of Health Services?

Elisabet Jacobsen, Dwayne Boyers, Paul Manson, Alison Avenell

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current obesity reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabet JacobsenHealth Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. elisabet.jacobsen@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3211-936X
Dwayne BoyersHealth Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. d.boyers@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9786-8118
Paul MansonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1405-1795
Alison AvenellHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-5628
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HERU1Chief Scientist Office HSRU1health technology assessment programme 15/09/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSevere obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m RECENT

findingsWhilst evidence shows bariatric surgery is often cost-effective, there is no clear consensus on the cost-effectiveness of non-surgical WMPs. Thirty-two studies were included. Most were short-term evaluations that did not capture the long-term costs and consequences of ORD. Decision models often included only a subset of relevant ORDs, and made varying assumptions about the rate of weight regain over time. A lack of sensitivity analyses limited interpretation of results. Heterogeneity in the definition of WMPs and usual care prevents formal evidence synthesis. We were unable to establish the most cost-effective WMPs. Addressing these limitations may help future studies provide more robust cost-effectiveness evidence for decision makers.

Indexed as

Obesity, MorbidCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth ServicesHumansCost-effectivenessSevere obesitySystematic reviewWeight management programmes

Identifiers

PMID36409442
PMCPMC9729129
OpenAlexW4309507641

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.