Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36419664›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

Biotechnological interventions in banana: current knowledge and future prospects.

Angima Kibari Justine, Navdeep Kaur, Savita, Pratap Kumar Pati

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Influence of TriploidPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Antarctic Streptomyces: Promising biocontrol agents for combatingBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angima Kibari JustineDepartment of Biotechnology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, 143005, Punjab, India.
Navdeep KaurDepartment of Biotechnology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, 143005, Punjab, India.
SavitaDepartment of Botany, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, 110007, Delhi, India.
Pratap Kumar PatiDepartment of Biotechnology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, 143005, Punjab, India.
Guru Nanak Dev University · INUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Banana is an important food crop responsible for ensuring food security, nutrition, and employment for a significant portion of the world population. It has fairly broad genetic diversity and is distributed widely across the globe. Due to its socio-economic importance, there has been growing demand for healthy and improved planting materials of banana. In recent years many companies and organizations are working hard to narrow down the gap between demand and supply of quality planting materials. The other challenges includes its susceptibility to adverse environmental conditions, attack of various pests/pathogens and improvement of nutritional quality of bananas. To address these issues, refinement of existing techniques and introduction of new experimental tools are required. However, the genetic improvement of bananas to a large extent is limited by using conventional methods due to polyploidy, heterozygosity, and sterility of this plant. For rapid multiplication and obtaining disease free and healthy plants, efficient

Indexed as

BananaGenetic improvementMicropropagationRegenerationStress tolerance

Identifiers

PMID36419664
PMCPMC9676558
OpenAlexW4309552540

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.