Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425035›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Seminal and vagino-uterine microbiome and their individual and interactive effects on cattle fertility.

Sarah M Luecke, Emily M Webb, Carl R Dahlen, Lawrence P Reynolds, Samat Amat

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Paternal effects on fetal programming.Animal reproduction · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah M LueckeDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Emily M WebbDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Carl R DahlenDepartment of Animal Sciences, and Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Lawrence P ReynoldsDepartment of Animal Sciences, and Center for Nutrition and Pregnancy, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Samat AmatDepartment of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
North Dakota State University · USDakota State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive failure is a major economical drain on cow-calf operations across the globe. It can occur in both males and females and stem from prenatal and postnatal influences. Therefore, the cattle industry has been making efforts to improve fertility and the pregnancy rate in cattle herds as an attempt to maintain sustainability and profitability of cattle production. Despite the advancements made in genetic selection, nutrition, and the implementation of various reproductive technologies, fertility rates have not significantly improved in the past 50 years. This signifies a missing factor or factors in current reproductive management practices that influence successful fertilization and pregnancy. Emerging lines of evidence derived from human and other animals including cattle suggest that the microbial continuum along the male and female reproductive tracts are associated with male and female fertility-that is, fertilization, implantation, and pregnancy success-highlighting the potential for harnessing the male and female reproductive microbiome to improve fertility in cattle. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the recent studies on the bovine seminal and vagino-uterine microbiome and discuss individual and interactive roles of these microbial communities in defining cattle fertility.

Indexed as

bovinefertilityinteractive effectsreproductive healthreproductive tract microbiomesemen

Identifiers

PMID36425035
PMCPMC9679222
OpenAlexW4308594718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.