Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36425567›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2022

Nanotechnology in interventional cardiology: A state-of-the-art review.

Talal Almas, Rakhshan Haider, Jahanzeb Malik, Asim Mehmood, Areej Alvi, Hifza Naz, Danish Iltaf Satti, Syed Muhammad Jawad Zaidi, Abdulla K AlSubai, Sara AlNajdi and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  8. Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Talal AlmasRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Rakhshan HaiderDepartment of Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Jahanzeb MalikCardiovascular Analytics Group, Hong Kong, China.
Asim MehmoodDepartment of Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Areej AlviDepartment of Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Hifza NazMedical Student, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Bicocca, Italy.
Danish Iltaf SattiDepartment of Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Syed Muhammad Jawad ZaidiDepartment of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Abdulla K AlSubaiRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sara AlNajdiRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Reema AlsufyaniRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Rahul Krylov RamtohulRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Abdullah AlmesriRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Majid AlsufyaniRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Abdulaziz H Al-BunniaRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Haitham Ahmed S AlghamdiRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Yasar SattarDepartment of Cardiology, West Virginia University, VA, USA.
M Chadi AlraiesDepartment of Cardiology, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, MI, USA.
Sameer RainaDepartment of Cardiology, West Virginia University, VA, USA.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEShifa International Hospital · PKWest Virginia State University · USRawalpindi Medical University · PKUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITWayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the contemporary techniques and devices available for invasive cardiology procedures, the current diagnostic, and interventional modalities have many shortcomings. As a contemporary cross-disciplinary technique, nanotechnology has demonstrated great potential in interventional cardiology practice. It has a pivotal role in detecting sensitive cardiac biomarkers, nanoparticle-enhanced gadolinium (Gd) contrast to enhance the detection of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and multimodal imaging like including optical coherence tomography (OCT)/infrared luminescence (IR) for coronary plaque characterization. Furthermore, in invasive cardiology, the potential benefit is in miniaturized cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), including leadless pacemakers and piezoelectric nanogenerators to self-power symbiotic cardiac devices. Nanoparticles are ideal for therapeutic drug delivery systems for atherosclerotic plaque regression, regeneration of fibrotic cardiomyocytes, and disruption of bacterial biofilm to enhance and prolong the effects of antimicrobial agents in infective endocarditis (IE). In summary, nanotechnology-assisted therapies can overtake conventional invasive cardiology and expand the horizon of microtechnology in the diagnosis and treatment of CAD in the foreseeable future.

Indexed as

Bacterial biofilmGoldInvasive cardiologyNanoparticlesOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID36425567
PMCPMC9678733
OpenAlexW4309569386

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.