ReviewBiomedicines2022
The Role of Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptors in Parkinson's Disease.
Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiomics Integration of Parkinson's Disease Datasets Reveals Unexpected Roles of IRE1 in Its Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Multiple Roles of Cannabinoids in the Olfactory System.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Reprogramming brain-resident macrophages: from disease drivers to therapeutic allies in neurological disorders.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Review
- The Endocannabinoid System in Human Disease: Molecular Signaling, Receptor Pharmacology, and Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Repolarization of inflammatory macrophages into reparative stage targeting cannabinoid receptor2: a potential perspective to dampen lung injury/ARDS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic Application of Modulators of Endogenous Cannabinoid System in Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Potential Neuroprotective Effect of the Endocannabinoid System on Parkinson's Disease.Parkinson's disease · 2024Review
- Exploring orphan GPCRs in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Phytocannabinoids: Pharmacological effects, biomedical applications, and worldwide prospection.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most frequent neurodegenerative disease and currently represents a clear unmet medical need. Therefore, novel preventive and therapeutic strategies are needed. Cannabinoid type 2 (CB2) receptors, one of the components of the endocannabinoid system, can regulate neuroinflammation in PD. Here, we review the current preclinical and clinical studies investigating the CB2 receptors in PD with the aim to clarify if these receptors could have a role in PD. Preclinical data show that CB2 receptors could have a neuroprotective action in PD and that the therapeutic targeting of CB2 receptors could be promising. Indeed, it has been shown that different CB2 receptor-selective agonists exert protective effects in different PD models. Moreover, the alterations in the expression of CB2 receptors observed in brain tissues from PD animal models and PD patients suggest the potential value of CB2 receptors as possible novel biomarkers for PD. However, to date, there is no direct evidence of the role of CB2 receptors in PD. Further studies are strongly needed in order to fully clarify the role of CB2 receptors in PD and thus pave the way to novel possible diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities for PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.