Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36428604›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Management of Recurrent Glioblastomas: What Can We Learn from the French Glioblastoma Biobank?

Anne Clavreul, Lila Autier, Jean-Michel Lemée, Paule Augereau, Gwénaëlle Soulard, Luc Bauchet, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Philippe Menei, Fgb Network, Collaborators of the FGB network

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A comparison study of dynamic [Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anne ClavreulDépartement de Neurochirurgie, CHU, 49933 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4477-8282
Lila AutierDépartement de Neurologie, CHU, 49933 Angers, France.
Jean-Michel LeméeDépartement de Neurochirurgie, CHU, 49933 Angers, France.
Paule AugereauDépartement d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Site Paul Papin, 49055 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4748-0799
Gwénaëlle SoulardDépartement de Neurochirurgie, CHU, 49933 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-1992
Luc BauchetDépartement de Neurochirurgie, Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, CHU Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France.
Dominique Figarella-BrangerAPHM, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, 13385 Marseille, France.
Philippe MeneiDépartement de Neurochirurgie, CHU, 49933 Angers, France.
Fgb Network
Collaborators of the FGB network
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FR

Funding

Cancéropôle Grand Ouest NAFrench National Cancer Institute INCA_6298GIS IBiSA NALigue Nationale Contre le Cancer NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe maximal resection followed by radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) is universally accepted as the first-line treatment for glioblastoma (GB), but no standard of care has yet been defined for managing recurrent GB (rGB). We used the French GB biobank (FGB) to evaluate the second-line options currently used, with a view to defining the optimal approach and future directions in GB research. We retrospectively analyzed data for 338 patients with de novo isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GB recurring after TMZ chemoradiotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to investigate survival outcomes. Median overall survival after first surgery (OS1) was 19.8 months (95% CI: 18.5-22.0) and median OS after first progression (OS2) was 9.9 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.8). Two second-line options were noted for rGB patients in the FGB: supportive care and treatments, with systemic treatment being the treatment most frequently used. The supportive care option was independently associated with a shorter OS2 (

Indexed as

IDH wild-typeprognosisrecurrent glioblastomareoperationsurvivalsystemic treatment

Identifiers

PMID36428604
PMCPMC9688811
OpenAlexW4308712284

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.