Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36431099›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

LABA/LAMA as First-Line Therapy for COPD: A Summary of the Evidence and Guideline Recommendations.

Marc Miravitlles, Tomotaka Kawayama, Michael Dreher

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical Concepts for Triple Therapy Use in Patients with COPD: A Delphi Consensus.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2023
    Article
  14. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting βTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
  15. Stepwise management of COPD: What is next after bronchodilation?Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9850-9520
Tomotaka KawayamaDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume 830-0011, Japan.
Michael DreherDepartment of Pneumology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3452-5329
Kurume University · JPUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhaled bronchodilators (alone or in combination) are the cornerstone of treatment for symptomatic patients with COPD, either as initial/first-line treatment or for second-line/treatment escalation in patients who experience persistent symptoms or exacerbations on monotherapy. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2022 report recommends initial pharmacological treatment with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or a long-acting β

Indexed as

bronchodilatorCOPDinhaled corticosteroidLABA/LAMA

Identifiers

PMID36431099
PMCPMC9692772
OpenAlexW4308721737

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.