ArticlePituitary2023
UK practice on incidentally detected non-functioning pituitary microadenomas: analysis of two national surveys during a 12-year interval.
Article in Pituitary, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A semantic segmentation model for automatic precise identification of pituitary microadenomas with preoperative MRI.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Long-term behaviour of non-functioning pituitary microadenomas: experience from a tertiary care centre in Romania.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- A Real-World Longitudinal Study in Non-Functioning Pituitary Incidentalomas: A PRECES Micro-Adenomas Sub-Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe optimal management approach for presumed non-functioning pituitary microadenomas (microNFPAs) remains unclear. Our aim was to capture current UK practice and identify changes with time.
methodsTwo online surveys investigating clinicians' approaches were performed in 2009-2010 and 2021-2022 (advertised through Society for Endocrinology UK).
results150 and 214 clinicians participated in the 2021 and 2009 survey, respectively (response rates 31.2% and 35.4%, respectively). At baseline, 2021 survey respondents were more likely to measure IGF-1 (96.0% vs 74.1%, p < 0.001) and morning cortisol (87.9% vs 62.6%, p < 0.001), and less likely GH (26.2% vs 42.6% p = 0.002), 24 h urine free cortisol (3.4% vs 23.2%, p < 0.0001) or dynamically assess adrenal reserve (11.4% vs 30.4%, p < 0.001). 47.2% of clinicians in 2021 would reassess pituitary function annually until discharge (in absence of tumour growth/symptoms). The 2021 survey respondents were more likely to stop imaging at or before 3 years (81.7% vs 44.3%, p < 0.001) and at or before 5 years (86.6.% vs 72.9%, p = 0.002), whilst 2009 survey respondents were more likely to continue imaging beyond 5 years (24% vs 7%, p < 0.001). Responses on imaging frequency/intervals showed notable variability in both surveys.
conclusionsDiagnostic and management approaches for microNFPAs have evolved in the UK. Biochemical investigations are performed in accord with consensus guidelines, though many clinicians perform annual biochemical surveillance without tumour growth/symptoms. A small number of clinicians request imaging beyond 5 years, but the frequency of imaging intervals until discharge remains variable. Robust evidence on the long-term natural history of microNFPAs is necessary to unify clinician approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.