ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2022
Health-promoting behaviors in staff and students of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating health promotion into the educational mission: a 25-year bottom-up institutional trajectory in a Chilean university.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- Predicting Factors Affecting the Reporting of Medical Errors by Nurses Using the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Study in Iran.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Designing the core competence model of health managers based on the approach of using management assessment centers in health care system.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- The effect of educational intervention on preventive behaviors against cutaneous leishmaniasis in employees of Shiraz special economic zone subsidiary companies.BMC public health · 2025Article
- An Empirical Study of Executive Function in College Students: The Predictive Role of Health-Promoting Behaviors and the Time-Course Effects of Motor-Cognitive Dual-Task Training.Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology · 2025Article
- Nutrition Education and Practice in University Dental and Oral Health Programmes and Curricula: A Scoping Review.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2025Article
- Explanation process of home care for patients with COVID-19 in Iran; A grounded theory study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Behavioral analysis and evolution of coronavirus encountering in Iranians' from common beliefs to people's performance.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Erratum: Health-promoting behaviors in staff and students of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Risk Perception in the COVID-19 pandemic; a health promotion approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe staff of health and dentistry schools can play an important role in encouraging students and their clients to adopt health and preventive behaviors. The aim of this study was to compare health-promoting behaviors in staff and students of health and dental schools in Ardabil University of Medical Sciences (ARUMS). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2021. The research population was staff and students of health and dental schools. Staff sampling was by census and students were sampled by simple random sampling. The data collection tool was a questionnaire whose validity and reliability had been confirmed in previous studies. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and analytical statistics tests using SPSS version 20 software. Linear regression was performed using stepwise method.
resultsThe results showed that the mean score of the individuals was 99.2 ± 20.24. In the leveling, the behaviors of 33 people (17.55%) were appropriate, desirable and good, and the health-promoting behaviors, 154 people (82.45%), were moderate and low. The correlation between age, gender, marital status, and workplace of the individuals with health-promoting behaviors was not statistically significant (
conclusionsHealth-promoting behaviors in <20% of students and staff are desirable, and in more than 80% of them are moderate and poor. Therefore, educational administrators should use these results in curriculum planning to increase health-promoting behaviors of students and staff. The score of health-promoting behaviors is related to the above-mentioned areas, but the relationship may not be linear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.