Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36440561›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2023

No strong evidence for universal gender differences in the development of cooperative behaviour across societies.

Bailey House, Joan B Silk, Katherine McAuliffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Gender differences in cooperation across 20 societies: a meta-analysis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. No strong evidence for universal gender differences in the development of cooperative behaviour across societies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bailey HouseDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-9724
Joan B SilkSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Katherine McAuliffeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cooperation varies both across and within societies, and developmental studies can inform our understanding of the sources of both kinds of variation. One key candidate for explaining within-society variation in cooperative behaviour is gender, but we know little about whether gender differences in cooperation take root early in ontogeny or emerge similarly across diverse societies. Here, we explore two existing cross-cultural datasets of 4- to 15-year-old children's preferences for equality in experimental tasks measuring prosociality (14 societies) and fairness (seven societies), and we look for evidence of (i) widespread gender differences in the development of cooperation, and (ii) substantial societal variation in gender differences. This cross-cultural approach is crucial for revealing universal human gender differences in the development of cooperation, and it helps answer recent calls for greater cultural diversity in the study of human development. We find that gender has little impact on the development of prosociality and fairness within these datasets, and we do not find much evidence for substantial societal variation in gender differences. We discuss the implications of these findings for our knowledge about the nature and origin of gender differences in cooperation, and for future research attempting to study human development using diverse cultural samples. This article is part of the theme issue 'Cooperation among women: evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives'.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorCultural DiversityAdolescentBiological EvolutionChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleSex Factorschild developmentcross-cultural differencesfairnessgender differencesprosocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID36440561
PMCPMC9703225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.