Evidence mapPaperPMID 36441574Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Effectiveness of Gamification in Knee Replacement Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With a Qualitative Approach.

Eeva Aartolahti, Maarit Janhunen, Niina Katajapuu, Juha Paloneva, Konsta Pamilo, Airi Oksanen, Hannes Keemu, Mikko Karvonen, Mika Luimula, Raija Korpelainen and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03717727 (Effectiveness of Gamification in Knee Replacement Rehabilitation. Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03717727 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Gamification in Knee Replacement Rehabilitation. Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of JyvaskylaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled52ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsExergame, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Eeva AartolahtiInstitute of Rehabilitation, JAMK University of Applied Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-926X
Maarit JanhunenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9004-8013
Niina KatajapuuFaculty of Health and Well-being, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-8928
Juha PalonevaDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Healthcare District and University of Eastern Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-9390
Konsta PamiloDepartment of Orthopedics, Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5961-4072
Airi OksanenDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-4839
Hannes KeemuDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3607-1666
Mikko KarvonenDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-065X
Mika LuimulaFaculty of Business and Engineering, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-1366
Raija KorpelainenDepartment of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Oulu Deaconess Institute Foundation sr, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-0542
Timo JämsäMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8394-9462
Keijo MäkeläDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4115-1767
Ari HeinonenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3681-9953
University of Turku · FIOulu University Hospital · FITurku University of Applied Sciences · FIUniversity of Jyväskylä · FICoxa Hospital · FIJAMK University of Applied Sciences · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExergames can provide encouraging exercise options. Currently, there is limited evidence regarding home-based exergaming in the postoperative phase of total knee replacement (TKR).

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the effects of a 4-month postoperative home-based exergame intervention with an 8-month follow-up on physical function and symptoms among older persons undergoing TKR compared with home exercise using a standard protocol. In addition, a concurrent embedded design of a mixed methods study was used by including a qualitative component within a quantitative study of exergame effects.

methodsThis was a dual-center, nonblinded, two-arm, parallel group randomized controlled trial with an embedded qualitative approach. This study aimed to recruit 100 patients who underwent their first unilateral TKR (aged 60-75 years). Participants were randomized to the exergame or standard home exercise arms. Participants followed a custom-made exergame program independently at their homes daily for 4 months. The primary outcomes at 4 months were function and pain related to the knee using the Oxford Knee Score questionnaire and mobility using the Timed Up and Go test. Other outcomes, in addition to physical function, symptoms, and disability, were game user experience, exercise adherence, physical activity, and satisfaction with the operated knee. Assessments were performed at the preoperative baseline and at 2, 4, and 12 months postoperatively. Exergame adherence was followed from game computers and using a structured diary. Self-reported standard exercise was followed for 4 months of intervention and physical activity was followed for 12 months using a structured diary. Qualitative data on patients' perspectives on rehabilitation and exergames were collected through laddering interviews at 4 and 12 months.

resultsThis study was funded in 2018. Data collection began in 2019 and was completed in January 2022. The COVID-19 pandemic caused an unavoidable situation in the study for recruitment, data collection, and statistical analysis. As of November 2020, a total of 52 participants had been enrolled in the study. Primary results are expected to be published by the end of 2022.

conclusionsOur study provides new knowledge on the effects of postoperative exergame intervention among older patients with TKR. In addition, this study provides a new understanding of gamified postoperative rehabilitation, home exercise adherence, physical function, and physical activity among older adults undergoing TKR.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03717727; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03717727. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/38434.

Indexed as

gamificationKinectknee arthroplastymixed methodsphysical therapyrandomized controlled trialrehabilitationserious gametherapeutic exercise

Identifiers

PMID36441574
PMCPMC9745648
OpenAlexW4310173401

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.