Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36442479›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2023

The Value of Glycemic Control Prior to Cancer Diagnosis on All-Cause Mortality among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Dutch Primary Care.

Jing de Haan-Du, Klaas H Groenier, Brendy Wauben-Spaetgens, Mathilde Jalving, Nanne Kleefstra, Gijs W D Landman, Geertruida H de Bock

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diabetes and cancer: glucose control impact on survival and tumor outcomes.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jing de Haan-DuUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3850-8112
Klaas H GroenierUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0414-1383
Brendy Wauben-SpaetgensDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-1081
Mathilde JalvingDepartment of Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9142-9050
Nanne KleefstraUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1473-8519
Gijs W D LandmanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6852-6450
Geertruida H de BockUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3104-4471
University Medical Center Groningen · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor glycemic control prior to cancer diagnosis for patients with preexisting type 2 diabetes (T2DM) may predict a worse cancer diagnosis. We investigated the association between pre-diagnosis glycemic control and all-cause mortality in patients with T2DM who develop cancer.

methodsThis prospective cohort study linked data from three sources covering 1989 to 2019: a T2DM benchmarking database, the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and the Personal Records Database. We included patients with T2DM and incident primary breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer (stage 0-III), with target glycemic control defined according to Dutch guidelines. Analysis involved estimating the association between glycemic control and all-cause mortality with Cox proportional hazard models, accounting for individual expected survival relative to the general population and relevant disease (e.g., diabetes duration and medications) and individual (e.g., age and gender) characteristics.

resultsOf the 71,648 linked cases, 620 had breast cancer, 774 had colorectal cancer, and 438 had prostate cancer, with follow-up data available for 6.4 (4.2-8.4), 5.6 (2.7-7.6), and 6.3 (4.5-8.2) years, respectively. Compared with patients with pre-diagnosis glycemic control at target, the HRs and 95% confidence intervals for mortality among those with pre-diagnosis glycemic control not at target were 1.40 (1.00-1.96) for breast cancer, 1.45 (1.12-1.88) for colorectal cancer, and 1.39 (0.98-1.98) for prostate cancer.

conclusionsAmong patients with T2DM in Dutch primary care, poor glycemic control before diagnosis with breast and colorectal cancer can increase mortality compared with good control. IMPACT: Glycemic control prior to cancer diagnosis is of prognostic value.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HyperglycemiaProstatic NeoplasmsGlycemic ControlHumansMalePrimary Health CareProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36442479
PMCPMC9900319
OpenAlexW4310121893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.