Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36446777›Full record

ReviewBlood cancer journal2022

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatment algorithm 2022.

Paul J Hampel, Sameer A Parikh

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood cancer journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lymphocyte count and risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Disruption of constitutive CXCR4 oligomers impairs oncogenic properties in lymphoid neoplasms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul J HampelDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1292-3024
Sameer A ParikhDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. parikh.sameer@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-7314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment landscape for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has changed considerably with the introduction of very effective oral targeted therapies (such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and venetoclax) and next-generation anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (such as obinutuzumab). These agents lead to improved outcomes in patients with CLL, even among those with high-risk features, such as del17p13 or TP53 mutation and unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGHV) genes. Selecting the right treatment for the right patient requires consideration of disease characteristics and prior treatment sequence, as well as patient preferences and comorbidities. The CLL-International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) remains the best-validated tool in predicting the time to first therapy among previously untreated patients, which guides selection for early intervention efforts. This review summarizes our current approach to the management of CLL, right from the time of diagnosis through relapsed disease.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellAlgorithmsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansMutationAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID36446777
PMCPMC9708674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.