Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36450772›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Tunable degrees of neurodegeneration in rats based on microsphere-induced models of chronic glaucoma.

María Jesús Rodrigo, Irene Bravo-Osuna, Manuel Subias, Alberto Montolío, José Cegoñino, Teresa Martinez-Rincón, Silvia Mendez-Martinez, Alba Aragón-Navas, David Garcia-Herranz, Luis Emilio Pablo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of trabecular meshwork-specific promotersInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Jesús Rodrigo *Department of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Irene Bravo-Osuna *Innovation, Therapy and Pharmaceutical Development in Ophthalmology (InnOftal) Research Group UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel SubiasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Alberto MontolíoBiomaterials Group, Aragon Engineering Research Institute (I3a), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
José CegoñinoBiomaterials Group, Aragon Engineering Research Institute (I3a), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Teresa Martinez-RincónDepartment of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Silvia Mendez-MartinezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Alba Aragón-NavasInnovation, Therapy and Pharmaceutical Development in Ophthalmology (InnOftal) Research Group UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
David Garcia-HerranzInnovation, Therapy and Pharmaceutical Development in Ophthalmology (InnOftal) Research Group UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Emilio PabloDepartment of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Rocío Herrero-VanrellInnovation, Therapy and Pharmaceutical Development in Ophthalmology (InnOftal) Research Group UCM 920415, Department of Pharmaceutics and Food Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Amaya Pérez Del PalomarBiomaterials Group, Aragon Engineering Research Institute (I3a), University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Elena Garcia-MartinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain. egmvivax@yahoo.com.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares four different animal models of chronic glaucoma against normal aging over 6 months. Chronic glaucoma was induced in 138 Long-Evans rats and compared against 43 aged-matched healthy rats. Twenty-five rats received episcleral vein sclerosis injections (EPIm cohort) while the rest were injected in the eye anterior chamber with a suspension of biodegradable microspheres: 25 rats received non-loaded microspheres (N-L Ms cohort), 45 rats received microspheres loaded with dexamethasone (MsDexa cohort), and 43 rats received microspheres co-loaded with dexamethasone and fibronectin (MsDexaFibro cohort). Intraocular pressure, neuroretinal function, structure and vitreous interface were evaluated. Each model caused different trends in intraocular pressure, produced specific retinal damage and vitreous signals. The steepest and strongest increase in intraocular pressure was seen in the EPIm cohort and microspheres models were more progressive. The EPIm cohort presented the highest vitreous intensity and percentage loss in the ganglion cell layer, the MsDexa cohort presented the greatest loss in the retinal nerve fiber layer, and the MsDexaFibro cohort presented the greatest loss in total retinal thickness. Function decreased differently among cohorts. Using biodegradable microspheres models it is possible to generate tuned neurodegeneration. These results support the multifactorial nature of glaucoma based on several noxa.

Indexed as

GlaucomaGraft vs Host DiseaseAnimalsDexamethasoneMicrospheresRatsRats, Long-EvansTonometry, OcularDexamethasone

Identifiers

PMID36450772
PMCPMC9712621
OpenAlexW4310638952

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.