Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36453398›Full record

ReviewNeural regeneration research2023

Translational bioengineering strategies for peripheral nerve regeneration: opportunities, challenges, and novel concepts.

Karim A Sarhane, Chenhu Qiu, Thomas G W Harris, Philip J Hanwright, Hai-Quan Mao, Sami H Tuffaha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural regeneration research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The interaction between oxidative stress and Schwann cells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Targeting CB1R Rewires CaTheranostics · 2025
    Article
  14. Cnicin: a promising drug for promoting nerve repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karim A SarhaneDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peripheral Nerve Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chenhu QiuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineering; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University; Translational Tissue Engineering Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas G W HarrisDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peripheral Nerve Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Philip J HanwrightDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peripheral Nerve Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hai-Quan MaoDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University Whiting School of Engineering; Institute for NanoBioTechnology, Johns Hopkins University; Translational Tissue Engineering Center; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sami H TuffahaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peripheral Nerve Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injuries remain a challenging problem in need of better treatment strategies. Despite best efforts at surgical reconstruction and postoperative rehabilitation, patients are often left with persistent, debilitating motor and sensory deficits. There are currently no therapeutic strategies proven to enhance the regenerative process in humans. A clinical need exists for the development of technologies to promote nerve regeneration and improve functional outcomes. Recent advances in the fields of tissue engineering and nanotechnology have enabled biomaterial scaffolds to modulate the host response to tissue repair through tailored mechanical, chemical, and conductive cues. New bioengineered approaches have enabled targeted, sustained delivery of protein therapeutics with the capacity to unlock the clinical potential of a myriad of neurotrophic growth factors that have demonstrated promise in enhancing regenerative outcomes. As such, further exploration of combinatory strategies leveraging these technological advances may offer a pathway towards clinically translatable solutions to advance the care of patients with peripheral nerve injuries. This review first presents the various emerging bioengineering strategies that can be applied for the management of nerve gap injuries. We cover the rationale and limitations for their use as an alternative to autografts, focusing on the approaches to increase the number of regenerating axons crossing the repair site, and facilitating their growth towards the distal stump. We also discuss the emerging growth factor-based therapeutic strategies designed to improve functional outcomes in a multimodal fashion, by accelerating axonal growth, improving the distal regenerative environment, and preventing end-organs atrophy.

Indexed as

bioengineeringbiomaterialsgrowth hormoneinsulin-like growth factor 1nanotechnologyneurobiologyperipheral nerve regenerationSchwann cellstranslational research

Identifiers

PMID36453398
PMCPMC9838159
OpenAlexW4310023872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.