ArticlePloS one2022
Quantitative PCR from human genomic DNA: The determination of gene copy numbers for congenital adrenal hyperplasia and RCCX copy number variation.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Steroidome Dysregulation and Complement C4 Copy Number Variation in Men With Central Serous Chorioretinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- New Candidate Reference Measurement Procedures for MET CNV Detection and Quantification Using Digital PCR.Biological procedures online · 2026Article
- Digital droplet PCR is an accurate and precise method to measure DNA copy number.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The known structural variations in hearing loss and their diagnostic approaches: a comprehensive review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is used for the determination of gene copy number (GCN). GCNs contribute to human disorders, and characterize copy number variation (CNV). The single laboratory method validations of duplex qPCR assays with hydrolysis probes on CYP21A1P and CYP21A2 genes, residing a CNV (RCCX CNV) and related to congenital adrenal hyperplasia, were performed using 46 human genomic DNA samples. We also performed the verifications on 5 qPCR assays for the genetic elements of RCCX CNV; C4A, C4B, CNV breakpoint, HERV-K(C4) CNV deletion and insertion alleles. Precision of each qPCR assay was under 1.01 CV%. Accuracy (relative error) ranged from 4.96±4.08% to 9.91±8.93%. Accuracy was not tightly linked to precision, but was significantly correlated with the efficiency of normalization using the RPPH1 internal reference gene (Spearman's ρ: 0.793-0.940, p>0.0001), ambiguity (ρ = 0.671, p = 0.029) and misclassification (ρ = 0.769, p = 0.009). A strong genomic matrix effect was observed, and target-singleplex (one target gene in one assay) qPCR was able to appropriately differentiate 2 GCN from 3 GCN at best. The analysis of all GCNs from the 7 qPCR assays using a multiplex approach increased the resolution of differentiation, and produced 98% of GCNs unambiguously, and all of which were in 100% concordance with GCNs measured by Southern blot, MLPA and aCGH. We conclude that the use of an internal (in one assay with the target gene) reference gene, the use of allele-specific primers or probes, and the multiplex approach (in one assay or different assays) are crucial for GCN determination using qPCR or other methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.