Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36454910›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Association of age, sex and race with prescription of anti-osteoporosis medications following low-energy hip fracture in a retrospective registry cohort.

Graeme Hoit, Daniel B Whelan, Amit Atrey, Bheeshma Ravi, Gareth Ryan, Earl Bogoch, Aileen M Davis, Amir Khoshbin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Return on investment of fracture liaison services: a systematic review and analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Graeme HoitDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5114-6999
Daniel B WhelanDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amit AtreyDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bheeshma RaviDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gareth RyanFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Earl BogochDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Aileen M DavisInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amir KhoshbinDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-3424
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInitiation of anti-osteoporosis medications after hip fracture lowers the risk of subsequent fragility fractures. Historical biases of targeting secondary fracture prevention towards certain groups may result in treatment disparities. We examined associations of patient age, sex and race with anti-osteoporosis medication prescription following hip fracture.

methodsA cohort of patients with a hip fracture between 2016-2018 was assembled from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry. Patients on anti-osteoporosis medications prior to admission were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted associations between patient age, sex and race and their interactions with prescription of anti-osteoporosis medications within 30 days of surgery.

resultsIn total, 12,249 patients with a hip fracture were identified with a median age of 82 years (IQR: 73-87), and 67% were female (n = 8,218). Thirty days postoperatively, 26% (n = 3146) of patients had been prescribed anti-osteoporosis medication. A significant interaction between age and sex with medication prescription was observed (p = 0.04). Male patients in their 50s (OR:0.75, 95%CI:0.60-0.92), 60s (OR:0.81, 95%CI:0.70-0.94) and 70s (OR:0.89, 95%CI:0.81-0.97) were less likely to be prescribed anti-osteoporosis medication compared to female patients of the same age. Patients who belonged to minority racial groups were not less likely to receive anti-osteoporosis medications than patients of white race.

interpretationOnly 26% of patients were prescribed anti-osteoporosis medications following hip fracture, despite consensus guidelines urging early initiation of secondary prevention treatments. Given that prescription varied by age and sex, strategies to prevent disparities in secondary fracture prevention are warranted.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesOsteoporosisAgedAged, 80 and overDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansInfantMaleRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36454910
PMCPMC9714945
OpenAlexW4310500603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.