ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2022
Comprehensive comparison of gene expression diversity among a variety of human stem cells.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel paradigm for single-cell annotation in stem cell research.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Definition of Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Meniscus Regeneration by the Mechanism of Action and General Amp1200 Gene Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Beyond the Usual Suspects: Examining the Role of Understudied Histone Variants in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Advancing diabetes treatment: the role of mesenchymal stem cells in islet transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several factors, including tissue origins and culture conditions, affect the gene expression of undifferentiated stem cells. However, understanding the basic identity across different stem cells has not been pursued well despite its importance in stem cell biology. Thus, we aimed to rank the relative importance of multiple factors to gene expression profile among undifferentiated human stem cells by analyzing publicly available RNA-seq datasets. We first conducted batch effect correction to avoid undefined variance in the dataset as possible. Then, we highlighted the relative impact of biological and technical factors among undifferentiated stem cell types: a more influence on tissue origins in induced pluripotent stem cells than in other stem cell types; a stronger impact of culture condition in embryonic stem cells and somatic stem cell types, including mesenchymal stem cells and hematopoietic stem cells. In addition, we found that a characteristic gene module, enriched in histones, exhibits higher expression across different stem cell types that were annotated by specific culture conditions. This tendency was also observed in mouse stem cell RNA-seq data. Our findings would help to obtain general insights into stem cell quality, such as the balance of differentiation potentials that undifferentiated stem cells possess.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.