Evidence mapPaperPMID 36459396Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2022

Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions in the Control of Lifestyle and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients After a Coronary Event: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Celia Cruz-Cobo, María Ángeles Bernal-Jiménez, Rafael Vázquez-García, María José Santi-Cano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07390006 (Enabling Patient-Reported Outcomes Through Innovative Care Approach in Thai Older Adults Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07390006 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Enabling Patient-Reported Outcomes Through Innovative Care Approach in Thai Older Adults Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Mixed Methods Experimental Design

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome/ Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery DiseaseArmsInnovative Care Approach, Usual Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Effects of a rehabilitation program based on home intelligent management platform guided among patient after lung cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trail.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Celia Cruz-CoboFaculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3842-9449
María Ángeles Bernal-JiménezFaculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6344-3285
Rafael Vázquez-GarcíaInstitute of Biomedical Research and Innovation of Cádiz (INiBICA), Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8876-474X
María José Santi-CanoFaculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4430-6031
Universidad de Cádiz · ESBiomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cadiz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary artery disease is the main cause of death and loss of disability-adjusted life years worldwide. Information and communication technology has become an important part of health care systems, including the innovative cardiac rehabilitation services through mobile phone and mobile health (mHealth) interventions.

objectiveIn this study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of different kinds of mHealth programs in changing lifestyle behavior, promoting adherence to treatment, and controlling modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and psychosocial outcomes in patients who have experienced a coronary event.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A thorough search of the following biomedical databases was conducted: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, CINAHL, Scopus, The Clinical Trial, and Cochrane. Articles that were randomized clinical trials that involved an intervention consisting of an mHealth program using a mobile app in patients after a coronary event were included. The articles analyzed some of the following variables as outcome variables: changes in lifestyle behavior, cardiovascular risk factors, and anthropometric and psychosocial variables. A meta-analysis of the variables studied was performed with the Cochrane tool. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool; the quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool; and heterogeneity was measured using the I

resultsA total of 23 articles were included in the review, and 20 (87%) were included in the meta-analysis, with a total sample size of 4535 patients. Exercise capacity measured using the 6-minute walk test (mean difference=21.64, 95% CI 12.72-30.55; P<.001), physical activity (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.42, 95% CI 0.04-0.81; P=.03), and adherence to treatment (risk difference=0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.28; P<.001) were significantly superior in the mHealth group. Furthermore, both the physical and mental dimensions of quality of life were better in the mHealth group (SMD=0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.44; P=.004 and SMD=0.27, 95% CI 0.06-0.47; P=.01, respectively). In addition, hospital readmissions for all causes and cardiovascular causes were statistically higher in the control group than in the mHealth group (SMD=-0.03, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.00; P=.04 vs SMD=-0.04, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.00; P=.05).

conclusionsmHealth technology has a positive effect on patients who have experienced a coronary event in terms of their exercise capacity, physical activity, adherence to medication, and physical and mental quality of life, as well as readmissions for all causes and cardiovascular causes.

trial registrationPROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42022299931; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=299931.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesTelemedicineHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansLife StyleQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Factorsacute coronary syndromecoronary diseasemobile appsmobile healthmobile phonesmartphone

Identifiers

PMID36459396
PMCPMC9758644
OpenAlexW4310778304

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.