Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36463269›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2022

Prediction of distant metastasis in esophageal cancer using a radiomics-clinical model.

Chao Zhu, Fengchun Mu, Songping Wang, Qingtao Qiu, Shuai Wang, Linlin Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IntegratingBMC cancer · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao ZhuDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266042, Shandong, China.
Fengchun MuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Songping WangDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Central Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266042, Shandong, China.
Qingtao QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
Shuai WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261000, Shandong, China.
Linlin WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China. wanglinlinatjn@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 8217102892Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2019LZL012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistant metastasis, which occurs at a rate of 25% in patients with esophageal cancer (EC), has a poor prognosis, with previous studies reporting an overall survival of only 3-10 months. However, few studies have been conducted to predict distant metastasis in EC, owing to a dearth of reliable biomarkers. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an accurate model for predicting distant metastasis in patients with EC.

methodsA total of 299 EC patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 207) and a validation cohort (n = 92). Logistic univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify clinical independent predictors and create a clinical nomogram. Radiomic features were extracted from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images taken prior to treatment, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) regression was used to screen the associated features, which were then used to develop a radiomic signature. Based on the screened features, four machine learning algorithms were used to build radiomics models. The joint nomogram with radiomic signature and clinically independent risk factors was developed using the logical regression algorithm. All models were validated and compared by discrimination, calibration, reclassification, and clinical benefit.

resultsMultivariable analyses revealed that age, N stage, and degree of pathological differentiation were independent predictors of distant metastasis, and a clinical nomogram incorporating these factors was established. A radiomic signature was developed by a set of sixteen features chosen from 851 radiomic features. The joint nomogram incorporating clinical factors and radiomic signature performed better [AUC(95% CI) 0.827(0.742-0.912)] than the clinical nomogram [AUC(95% CI) 0.731(0.626-0.836)] and radiomics predictive models [AUC(95% CI) 0.754(0.652-0.855), LR algorithms]. Calibration and decision curve analyses revealed that the radiomics-clinical nomogram outperformed the other models. In comparison with the clinical nomogram, the joint nomogram's NRI was 0.114 (95% CI 0.075-0.345), and its IDI was 0.071 (95% CI 0.030-0.112), P = 0.001.

conclusionsWe developed and validated the first radiomics-clinical nomogram for distant metastasis in EC which may aid clinicians in identifying patients at high risk of distant metastasis.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsAlgorithmsEthnicityHumansMultivariate AnalysisTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID36463269
PMCPMC9719117

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.