ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Development and validation of a prognostic 9-gene signature for colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A robust ensemble feature selection approach to prioritize genes associated with survival outcome in high-dimensional gene expression data.Frontiers in systems biology · 2024Article
- Single-cell RNA-Seq and bulk RNA-Seq reveal reliable diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for CRC.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers globally with a high mortality rate. Predicting prognosis using disease progression and cancer pathologic stage is insufficient, and a prognostic factor that can accurately evaluate patient prognosis needs to be developed. In this study, we aimed to infer a prognostic gene signature to identify a functional signature associated with the prognosis of CRC patients. Methods: First, we used univariate Cox regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) regression, and multivariate Cox regression analyses to screen genes significantly associated with CRC patient prognosis, from colorectal cancer RNA sequencing data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We then calculated the risk score (RS) for each patient based on the expression of the nine candidate genes and developed a prognostic signature. Results: Based on the optimal cut-off on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, patients were separated into high- and low-risk groups, and the difference in overall survival between the two groups was examined. Patients in the low-risk group had a better overall survival rate than those in the high-risk group. The results were validated using the GSE72970, GSE39582, and GSE17536 Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, and the same conclusions were reached. ROC curve test of the RS signature also indicated that it had excellent accuracy. The RS signature was then compared with traditional clinical factors as a prognostic indicator, and we discovered that the RS signature had superior predictive ability. Conclusion: The RS signature developed in this study has excellent predictive power for the prognosis of patients with CRC and broad applicability as a prognostic indicator for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.