Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36466449›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Healthcare preferences of the general Chinese population in the hierarchical medical system: A discrete choice experiment.

Ni Yan, Taoran Liu, Yuan Xu, Xuanbi Fang, Xinyang Ma, Meng Yang, Jianhao Du, Zijian Tan, Er-Wen Fan, Jian Huang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ni YanDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Taoran LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yuan XuDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuanbi FangDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xinyang MaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Meng YangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianhao DuDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zijian TanDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Er-Wen FanDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian HuangSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences (SICS), Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (ASTAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Babatunde AkinwunmiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, United States.
Casper J P ZhangSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wai-Kit MingDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Liangping LuoDepartment of Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
City University of Hong Kong · HKJinan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGBrigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chinese health insurance system faces resource distribution challenges. A patient-centric approach allows decision-makers to be keenly aware of optimized medical resource allocation. Objective: This study aims to use the discrete choice model to determine the main factors affecting the healthcare preferences of the general Chinese population and their weights in the three scenarios (chronic non-communicable diseases, acute infectious diseases, and major diseases). Methods: This study firstly identified the key factors affecting people's healthcare preferences through literature review and qualitative interviews, and then designed the DCE questionnaire. An online questionnaire produced by Lighthouse Studio (version 9.9.1) software was distributed to voluntary respondents recruited from mainland China's entire population from January 2021 to June 2021. Participants were required to answer a total of 21 questions of three scenarios in the questionnaire. The multinomial logit model and latent class model were used to analyze the collected data. Results: A total of 4,156 participants from mainland China were included in this study. The multinomial logit and latent class model analyses showed that medical insurance reimbursement is the most important attribute in all three disease scenarios. In the scenario of "non-communicable diseases," the attributes that participants valued were, from the most to the least, medical insurance reimbursement (45.0%), hospital-level (21.6%), distance (14.4%), cost (9.7%), waiting time (8.3%), and care provider (1.0%). As for willingness to pay (WTP), participants were willing to pay 204.5 yuan, or 1,743.8 yuan, to change from private hospitals or community hospitals to tertiary hospitals, respectively. Conclusions: This study explores the healthcare preferences of Chinese residents from a new perspective, which can provide theoretical reference for the refinement of many disease medical reimbursement policies, such as developing different reimbursement ratios for various common diseases and realizing rational configuration of medical resources.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesAsian PeopleChinaDelivery of Health CareHospitals, CommunityHumansacute infectious diseaseschronic non-communicable diseasesdiscrete choice experimenthealthcare preferenceshealth insurancehierarchical medical systemmajor diseases

Identifiers

PMID36466449
PMCPMC9713319
OpenAlexW4309606920

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.