ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Polymorphisms in drug metabolism genes predict the risk of refractory myasthenia gravis.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in adults with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Persistent symptoms, exacerbations and drug side effects despite treatment in myasthenia gravis.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nearly 10% to 20% of myasthenia gravis (MG) patients are refractory to conventional treatment for unclear reasons. The study aimed to explore the relationship between drug metabolism gene polymorphisms and refractory MG. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one MG patients (33 in the refractory group; 98 in the non-refractory group) admitted to Tongji Hospital were included in this retrospective study. Improved multiplex ligation detection reaction (iMLDR) was used to genotype 13 polymorphisms (NR3C1 rs17209237, rs9324921; FKBP5 rs1360780, rs4713904, rs9296158; HSP90AA1 rs10873531, rs2298877, rs7160651; MDR1 rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2032582; CYP3A4 rs2242480; and CYP3A5 rs776746). We applied multivariable logistic regression to investigate the association between refractory MG and nucleotide polymorphisms. Generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) was used to examine gene-gene interactions. Results: CC genotype of HSP90AA1 rs7160651 was associated with the increased risk of refractory MG than CT genotype [odds ratio (OR) =0.26; P=0.041] and CT + TT genotype (dominant model, OR =0.24; P=0.022). For CYP3A5 rs776746, AA genotype was associated with refractory MG compared with AG genotype (OR =0.11; P=0.017), GG genotype (OR =0.18; P=0.033), and AG + GG genotype (dominant model, OR =0.16; P=0.020). The frequency of CAT haplotype of HSP90AA1 rs10873531, rs2298877, rs7160651 was less common in refractory patients (OR =0.33; P=0.044). No significant gene-gene interactions were observed. Conclusions: HSP90AA1 rs7160651 and CYP3A5 rs776746 were significantly associated with refractory MG. Further studies are warranted to confirm the results and investigate the use of polymorphisms for treatment individualization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.