Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36477733›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2023

Patient stratification for determining optimal second-line and third-line therapy for type 2 diabetes: the TriMaster study.

Beverley M Shields, John M Dennis, Catherine D Angwin, Fiona Warren, William E Henley, Andrew J Farmer, Naveed Sattar, Rury R Holman, Angus G Jones, Ewan R Pearson and 2 more

Open access · hybridFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reduced Weight Gain with Pioglitazone vs Vildagliptin inDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Beverley M ShieldsDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
John M DennisDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-732X
Catherine D AngwinDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Fiona WarrenClinical Trials Unit, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
William E HenleyInstitute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Andrew J FarmerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-4402
Naveed SattarSchool of Cardiovascular & Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1604-2593
Rury R HolmanDiabetes Trials Unit, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1256-874X
Angus G JonesDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-7599
Ewan R PearsonPopulation Health & Genomics, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-8585
Andrew T HattersleyDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. a.t.Hattersley@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5620-473X
TriMaster Study group
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation SP/19/6/34809Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K005707/1Medical Research Council MR/N00633X/1Medical Research Council MR/W003988/1Wellcome Trust 102820/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine aims to treat an individual based on their clinical characteristics. A differential drug response, critical to using these features for therapy selection, has never been examined directly in type 2 diabetes. In this study, we tested two hypotheses: (1) individuals with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsMetforminCanagliflozinDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsPioglitazoneSitagliptin PhosphateTreatment OutcomeCanagliflozinDipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminPioglitazoneSitagliptin Phosphate

Identifiers

PMID36477733
PMCPMC7614216
OpenAlexW4310937706

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.