Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36480158›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2023

Barriers and facilitators to primary care engagement for people who inject drugs: A systematic review.

Omeid Heidari, Kayla Tormohlen, Derek T Dangerfield, Karin E Tobin, Jason E Farley, Shoshana V Aronowitz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Omeid HeidariDepartment of Child, Family, and Population Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-4029
Kayla TormohlenDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Derek T DangerfieldDepartment of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, District of Columbia, Washington, USA.
Karin E TobinDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society. Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Jason E FarleyCenter for Infectious Disease and Nursing Innovation, School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Shoshana V AronowitzDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

NIDA Epidemiology Training Program: Johns Hopkins UniversityT32DA007292 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RENEE M. JOHNSON, Brion S Maher · 1993 to 2026
$17.7M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007292NIDA NIH HHS T32DA007292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople who inject drugs (PWID) have a greater burden of multimorbid chronic diseases than the general population. However, little attention has been paid to the engagement in primary care for services related specifically to injection drug use and management of underlying chronic comorbid diseases for this population. This systematic review identified facilitators and barriers to healthcare engagement in the primary care setting among PWID. DESIGN AND

methodsStudies were identified by a literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE, and by searching the references of retrieved articles. Studies were included if they measured active injection drug use, and outcomes related to primary care engagement characterized by: diagnosis of a health condition, linkage or retention in care, health condition-related outcomes, and reported patient-provider relationship.

resultsTwenty-three articles were included. Using the behavioral model, factors within predisposing, enabling, need, and health behavior domains were identified. Having co-located services and a positive patient-provider relationship were among the strongest factors associated with healthcare utilization and engagement while active injection drug use was associated with decreased engagement.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the only review of evidence that has examined factors related to primary care engagement for people who inject drugs. Most articles were observational studies utilizing descriptive designs. Although the assessment of the evidence was primarily rated 'Good', this review identifies a significant need to improve our understanding of primary care engagement for PWID. Future research and intervention strategies should consider these findings to better integrate the holistic care needs of PWID into primary care to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with injection drug use and chronic disease. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Primary care engagement is important for preventative care, early diagnosis of disease, and management of chronic diseases, including addressing problems of substance use. This review highlights factors nurses can utilize to facilitate primary care engagement of PWID.

Indexed as

Drug UsersHIV InfectionsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousChronic DiseaseDelivery of Health CareHumansPrimary Health Careadvanced practice nursinghealth disparitiesHIV/AIDSinfectious diseasesprimary health caresubstance use

Identifiers

PMID36480158
PMCPMC10635283

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.