Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36481809›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2023

CRISPR screens for functional interrogation of immunity.

Hao Shi, John G Doench, Hongbo Chi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulators of CD8Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  14. Functional Genomics: Principles and Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hao ShiDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2796-629X
John G DoenchGenetic Perturbation Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3707-9889
Hongbo ChiDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA. hongbo.chi@stjude.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9997-2496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based technologies represent a major breakthrough in biomedical science as they offer a powerful platform for unbiased screening and functional genomics in various fields, including immunology. Pooled and arrayed CRISPR screens have uncovered previously unknown intracellular drivers in innate and adaptive immune cells for immune regulation as well as intercellular regulators mediating cell-cell interactions. Recent single-cell CRISPR screening platforms expand the readouts to the transcriptome and enable the inference of gene regulatory networks for better mechanistic insights. CRISPR screens also allow for mapping of genetic interactions to identify genes that synergize or alleviate complex immune phenotypes. Here, we review the progress in and emerging adaptation of CRISPR technologies to advance our fundamental immunological knowledge and identify novel disease targets for immunotherapy of infection, inflammation and cancer.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsNeoplasmsGenomicsHumansPhenotypeTranscriptome

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.