ArticleHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2022
Risk factors and screening for neurocognitive impacts of therapy.
Article in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disparities in Psychosocial Outcomes Among Pediatric Cancer Survivors Living in Rural and Appalachian Areas.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2026Article
- Severe Sepsis During Treatment for Childhood Leukemia and Sequelae Among Adult Survivors.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Long-term follow-up of CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in children and young adults with B-ALL.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term survivors of pediatric hematologic malignancies are at elevated risk for neurocognitive impairment. Such impairment manifests in different ways at different times during survivorship, with deficits in processing speed, attention, and memory often appearing before deficits in executive function, intelligence, and academics. Survivors exposed to therapies that directly target the central nervous system (CNS), as is the case in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, may demonstrate subtle deficits during frontline therapy, and these deficits may grow and evolve over time. Survivors who do not receive CNS-directed therapies (eg, Hodgkin lymphoma) are also at elevated risk for neurocognitive impairment, although the influence on brain function is indirect through cancer therapy impact on systemic organ function vital to brain health (eg, cardiopulmonary morbidity). Over the course of the survivor's life span, the presence and impact of neurocognitive deficits will be determined by a complex interaction between premorbid development and environment, cancer therapy and clinical care, and posttreatment recovery and health. The timing and type of these treatment and health events will dictate the approach to screening and monitoring for neurocognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.