Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36494799›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Factors influencing physical inactivity status among chinese pregnant women: a cross-sectional study.

Tianchun Zhou, Yuping Lin, Feng Xu, Xiaoxia Ma, Na Wang, Yan Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tianchun ZhouNursing Department, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University, No. 128 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Yuping LinNursing Department, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University, No. 128 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Feng XuNursing Department, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University, No. 128 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Xiaoxia MaNursing Department, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University, No. 128 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Na WangNursing Department, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University, No. 128 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200090, China. nawang16@fudan.edu.cn.
Yan DingNursing Department, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital of Fudan University, No. 128 Shenyang Road, Shanghai, 200090, China. ding_yan@fudan.edu.cn.
Fudan University · CNObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University FC2021CR203_ZCShanghai Municipal Health Commission 202150050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular prenatal physical activity provides numerous health benefits to both mother and fetus. However, little is known about the physical activity status of pregnant women in China and whether they meet the current guidelines for prenatal physical activity. The aims of the study were to assess physical inactivity status and associated factors among pregnant women in Shanghai, China.

methodsA cross-sectional study of 1636 pregnant women were recruited at a tertiary obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Shanghai. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics and health information were obtained using structured questionnaires or from the electronic medical records. Physical inactivity status was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. Factors pertinent to physical inactivity were identified by binary logistic regression and were reported with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software package.

resultsIn total, the prevalence of physical inactivity was 47.5%. Walking was the main form of physical activity and only 2.8% of the pregnant women achieved the goal of at least 150 min of moderate-intensity physical activity weekly. Multivariate logistic regression identified a significant negative association of physical inactivity with personal monthly income (adjusted OR 0.648, 95% CI 0.505-0.831), engagement in regular exercise before pregnancy (adjusted OR 0.575, 95% CI 0.464-0.711) and in the second (adjusted OR 0.534, 95% CI 0.411-0.693) or third (adjusted OR 0.615, 95% CI 0.470-0.806) trimester of pregnancy. Women with nausea or vomiting during pregnancy were more likely to be physically inactive during pregnancy (adjusted OR 1.307, 95% CI 1.002-1.705).

conclusionPhysical inactivity is highly prevalent among pregnant women in China. Further efforts should be taken to overcome the barriers to prenatal physical activity and to promote moderate- to vigorous-intensity activities among Chinese pregnant women.

Indexed as

East Asian PeopleSedentary BehaviorChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleExerciseFactorsPhysical activityPregnancyPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID36494799
PMCPMC9733201
OpenAlexW4311669652

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.