Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36495018›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023

Fully automatic tumor segmentation of breast ultrasound images with deep learning.

Shuai Zhang, Mei Liao, Jing Wang, Yongyi Zhu, Yanling Zhang, Jian Zhang, Rongqin Zheng, Linyang Lv, Dejiang Zhu, Hao Chen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Toward Real-Time Backscatter Coefficient Estimation Incorporating the U-Net Segmentation and an In Vivo Reference Target.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuai ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Mei LiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yongyi ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanling ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Rongqin ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Linyang LvPrecision Care technology, Hangzhou, China.
Dejiang ZhuPrecision Care technology, Hangzhou, China.
Hao ChenPrecision Care technology, Hangzhou, China.
Wei WangCollaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, School of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Precision Spine (United States) · USSun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CNCollaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures · CNEmory University · USNanjing Brain Hospital · CNNanjing University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11774158National Natural Science Foundation of China 11934008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast ultrasound (BUS) imaging is one of the most prevalent approaches for the detection of breast cancers. Tumor segmentation of BUS images can facilitate doctors in localizing tumors and is a necessary step for computer-aided diagnosis systems. While the majority of clinical BUS scans are normal ones without tumors, segmentation approaches such as U-Net often predict mass regions for these images. Such false-positive problem becomes serious if a fully automatic artificial intelligence system is used for routine screening.

methodsIn this study, we proposed a novel model which is more suitable for routine BUS screening. The model contains a classification branch that determines whether the image is normal or with tumors, and a segmentation branch that outlines tumors. Two branches share the same encoder network. We also built a new dataset that contains 1600 BUS images from 625 patients for training and a testing dataset with 130 images from 120 patients for testing. The dataset is the largest one with pixel-wise masks manually segmented by experienced radiologists. Our code is available at https://github.com/szhangNJU/BUS_segmentation.

resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for classifying images into normal/abnormal categories was 0.991. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for segmentation of mass regions was 0.898, better than the state-of-the-art models. Testing on an external dataset gave a similar performance, demonstrating a good transferability of our model. Moreover, we simulated the use of the model in actual clinic practice by processing videos recorded during BUS scans; the model gave very low false-positive predictions on normal images without sacrificing sensitivities for images with tumors.

conclusionsOur model achieved better segmentation performance than the state-of-the-art models and showed a good transferability on an external test set. The proposed deep learning architecture holds potential for use in fully automatic BUS health screening.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computerautomatic segmentationbreast cancerbreast ultrasounddeep learning

Identifiers

PMID36495018
PMCPMC9859996
OpenAlexW4311027680

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.